WallStSmart

Kinder Morgan Inc (KMI)vsVertiv Holdings Co (VRT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Kinder Morgan Inc generates 62% more annual revenue ($17.52B vs $10.84B). KMI leads profitability with a 18.9% profit margin vs 14.4%. VRT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.66. VRT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 67/100 (B-).

KMI

Buy

64

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 6.0Profit: 7.5Value: 3.3Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 4/9

VRT

Strong Buy

67

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 10.0Profit: 8.0Value: 3.7Quality: 6.3
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.25
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

KMISignificantly Overvalued (-29.1%)

Margin of Safety

-29.1%

Fair Value

$24.36

Current Price

$32.25

$7.89 premium

UndervaluedFair: $24.36Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for VRT.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

KMI4 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$70.13B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
2.3x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
29.9%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 29.9%

EPS GrowthGrowth
36.0%8/10

Earnings expanding 36.0% YoY

VRT4 strengths · Avg: 9.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
45.1%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 45 in profit

Revenue GrowthGrowth
30.1%10/10

Revenue surging 30.1% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
135.7%10/10

Earnings expanding 135.7% YoY

Market CapQuality
$130.60B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Areas to Watch

KMI1 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
3.872/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

VRT3 concerns · Avg: 2.7/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.664/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
85.4x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
35.7x2/10

Trading at 35.7x book value

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : KMI

The strongest argument for KMI centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 18.9% and operating margin at 29.9%. Revenue growth of 13.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : VRT

The strongest argument for VRT centers on Return on Equity, Revenue Growth, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 30.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : KMI

The primary concerns for KMI are PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : VRT

The primary concerns for VRT are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Price/Book. A P/E of 85.4x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

KMI profiles as a mature stock while VRT is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

VRT carries more volatility with a beta of 2.10 — expect wider price swings.

VRT is growing revenue faster at 30.1% — sustainability is the question.

KMI generates stronger free cash flow (687M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

VRT scores higher overall (67/100 vs 64/100) and 30.1% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Kinder Morgan Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM · USA

Kinder Morgan, Inc. is one of the largest energy infrastructure companies in North America. The company specializes in owning and controlling oil and gas pipelines and terminals.

Vertiv Holdings Co

INDUSTRIALS · ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT & PARTS · USA

Vertiv Holdings Co designs, manufactures and services critical digital infrastructure technologies and lifecycle services for data centers, communication networks, and commercial and industrial environments in the Americas, Asia Pacific, Europe, the Middle East, and Africa. The company is headquartered in Columbus, Ohio.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?