Energy Transfer LP (ET)vsKinder Morgan Inc (KMI)
ET
Energy Transfer LP
$21.14
+0.43%
ENERGY · Cap: $74.20B
KMI
Kinder Morgan Inc
$31.84
+1.69%
ENERGY · Cap: $68.66B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Energy Transfer LP generates 498% more annual revenue ($107.38B vs $17.96B). KMI leads profitability with a 19.3% profit margin vs 4.9%. ET appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.67. ET earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 72/100 (B).
ET
Strong Buy72
out of 100
Grade: B
KMI
Strong Buy68
out of 100
Grade: B-
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+86.4%
Fair Value
$156.76
Current Price
$21.14
$135.62 discount
Margin of Safety
-41.1%
Fair Value
$22.56
Current Price
$31.84
$9.28 premium
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Revenue surging 78.4% year-over-year
Earnings expanding 85.3% YoY
Large-cap with strong market position
Growing faster than its price suggests
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Reasonable price relative to book value
Strong operational efficiency at 30.1%
Large-cap with strong market position
Reasonable price relative to book value
Earnings expanding 21.2% YoY
Areas to Watch
4.9% margin — thin
Elevated debt levels
Weak financial health signals
Elevated debt levels
Expensive relative to growth rate
Distress zone — elevated risk
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : ET
The strongest argument for ET centers on Revenue Growth, EPS Growth, Market Cap. Revenue growth of 78.4% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.67 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bull Case : KMI
The strongest argument for KMI centers on Operating Margin, Market Cap, Price/Book. Profitability is solid with margins at 19.3% and operating margin at 30.1%. Revenue growth of 10.8% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bear Case : ET
The primary concerns for ET are Profit Margin, Debt/Equity, Piotroski F-Score. Debt-to-equity of 1.99 is elevated, increasing financial risk. Thin 4.9% margins leave little buffer for downturns.
Bear Case : KMI
The primary concerns for KMI are Debt/Equity, PEG Ratio, Altman Z-Score.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
ET profiles as a hypergrowth stock while KMI is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.
ET carries more volatility with a beta of 0.57 — expect wider price swings.
ET is growing revenue faster at 78.4% — sustainability is the question.
ET generates stronger free cash flow (2.7B), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
ET scores higher overall (72/100 vs 68/100) and 78.4% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Strong Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Energy Transfer LP
ENERGY · OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM · USA
Energy Transfer LP offers energy related services. The company is headquartered in Dallas, Texas.
Kinder Morgan Inc
ENERGY · OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM · USA
Kinder Morgan, Inc. is one of the largest energy infrastructure companies in North America. The company specializes in owning and controlling oil and gas pipelines and terminals.
Compare with Other OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?