WallStSmart

Kewaunee Scientific Corporation (KEQU)vsWhirlpool Corporation (WHR)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Whirlpool Corporation generates 5191% more annual revenue ($14.92B vs $282.00M). KEQU leads profitability with a 3.4% profit margin vs 1.3%. KEQU trades at a lower P/E of 11.4x. WHR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 52/100 (C-).

KEQU

Hold

38

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 3.3Profit: 6.0Value: 5.7Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 3.28

WHR

Buy

52

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 2.0Profit: 4.0Value: 6.3Quality: 3.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.26
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

KEQUSignificantly Overvalued (-18.1%)

Margin of Safety

-18.1%

Fair Value

$33.69

Current Price

$34.45

$0.76 premium

UndervaluedFair: $33.69Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for WHR.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

KEQU3 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
11.4x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.3x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.2810/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

WHR2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.6x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

P/E RatioValuation
12.1x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Areas to Watch

KEQU4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Market CapQuality
$105.56M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
3.4%3/10

3.4% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-7.5%2/10

Revenue declined 7.5%

WHR4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
4.3%3/10

ROE of 4.3% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
1.3%3/10

1.3% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
1.6%3/10

Operating margin of 1.6%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : KEQU

The strongest argument for KEQU centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Altman Z-Score.

Bull Case : WHR

The strongest argument for WHR centers on Price/Book, P/E Ratio. PEG of 1.04 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : KEQU

The primary concerns for KEQU are Market Cap, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score. Thin 3.4% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : WHR

The primary concerns for WHR are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. Debt-to-equity of 2.05 is elevated, increasing financial risk. Thin 1.3% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

WHR carries more volatility with a beta of 1.15 — expect wider price swings.

WHR is growing revenue faster at -6.8% — sustainability is the question.

KEQU generates stronger free cash flow (5M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor FURNISHINGS, FIXTURES & APPLIANCES industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

WHR scores higher overall (52/100 vs 38/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Kewaunee Scientific Corporation

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · FURNISHINGS, FIXTURES & APPLIANCES · USA

Kewaunee Scientific Corporation designs, manufactures and installs laboratory, sanitary and technical furniture products. The company is headquartered in Statesville, North Carolina.

Whirlpool Corporation

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · FURNISHINGS, FIXTURES & APPLIANCES · USA

The Whirlpool Corporation is an American multinational manufacturer and marketer of home appliances, headquartered in Benton Charter Township, Michigan, United States.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?