WallStSmart

Kewaunee Scientific Corporation (KEQU)vsWhirlpool Corporation (WHR)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Whirlpool Corporation generates 5799% more annual revenue ($15.52B vs $263.18M). KEQU leads profitability with a 4.7% profit margin vs 2.1%. KEQU trades at a lower P/E of 9.7x. KEQU earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 60/100 (C+).

KEQU

Buy

60

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 9.3Profit: 6.0Value: 8.3Quality: 5.0

WHR

Buy

51

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 2.0Profit: 4.5Value: 7.3Quality: 3.8
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.26
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

KEQUUndervalued (+79.4%)

Margin of Safety

+79.4%

Fair Value

$193.28

Current Price

$34.18

$159.10 discount

UndervaluedFair: $193.28Overvalued
WHRSignificantly Overvalued (-141.2%)

Margin of Safety

-141.2%

Fair Value

$38.49

Current Price

$55.22

$16.73 premium

UndervaluedFair: $38.49Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

KEQU4 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
P/E RatioValuation
9.7x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.5x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
46.9%10/10

Revenue surging 46.9% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
40.5%8/10

Earnings expanding 40.5% YoY

WHR2 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
9.8x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.1x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

KEQU2 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Market CapQuality
$114.77M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
4.7%3/10

4.7% margin — thin

WHR4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Profit MarginProfitability
2.1%3/10

2.1% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
3.4%3/10

Operating margin of 3.4%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-0.9%2/10

Revenue declined 0.9%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : KEQU

The strongest argument for KEQU centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 46.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : WHR

The strongest argument for WHR centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 1.04 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : KEQU

The primary concerns for KEQU are Market Cap, Profit Margin. Thin 4.7% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : WHR

The primary concerns for WHR are Profit Margin, Operating Margin, Piotroski F-Score. Thin 2.1% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

KEQU profiles as a hypergrowth stock while WHR is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

WHR carries more volatility with a beta of 1.20 — expect wider price swings.

KEQU is growing revenue faster at 46.9% — sustainability is the question.

WHR generates stronger free cash flow (1.0B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

KEQU scores higher overall (60/100 vs 51/100) and 46.9% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Kewaunee Scientific Corporation

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · FURNISHINGS, FIXTURES & APPLIANCES · USA

Kewaunee Scientific Corporation designs, manufactures and installs laboratory, sanitary and technical furniture products. The company is headquartered in Statesville, North Carolina.

Whirlpool Corporation

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · FURNISHINGS, FIXTURES & APPLIANCES · USA

The Whirlpool Corporation is an American multinational manufacturer and marketer of home appliances, headquartered in Benton Charter Township, Michigan, United States.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?