WallStSmart

Kewaunee Scientific Corporation (KEQU)vsWhirlpool Corporation (WHR)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Whirlpool Corporation generates 5174% more annual revenue ($15.18B vs $287.75M). KEQU leads profitability with a 3.9% profit margin vs 1.1%. KEQU trades at a lower P/E of 10.1x. WHR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 52/100 (C-).

KEQU

Hold

41

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 4.7Profit: 5.5Value: 5.7Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 2.67

WHR

Buy

52

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 2.0Profit: 4.0Value: 6.3Quality: 3.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.26
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

KEQUSignificantly Overvalued (-15.4%)

Margin of Safety

-15.4%

Fair Value

$34.50

Current Price

$37.41

$2.91 premium

UndervaluedFair: $34.50Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for WHR.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

KEQU2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
10.1x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

WHR2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.7x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

P/E RatioValuation
14.5x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Areas to Watch

KEQU4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
3.3%4/10

3.3% revenue growth

Market CapQuality
$107.23M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
3.9%3/10

3.9% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
3.7%3/10

Operating margin of 3.7%

WHR4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
4.3%3/10

ROE of 4.3% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
1.1%3/10

1.1% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
1.3%3/10

Operating margin of 1.3%

Debt/EquityHealth
1.883/10

Elevated debt levels

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : KEQU

The strongest argument for KEQU centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book.

Bull Case : WHR

The strongest argument for WHR centers on Price/Book, P/E Ratio. PEG of 1.04 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : KEQU

The primary concerns for KEQU are Revenue Growth, Market Cap, Profit Margin. Thin 3.9% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : WHR

The primary concerns for WHR are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. Debt-to-equity of 1.88 is elevated, increasing financial risk. Thin 1.1% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

WHR carries more volatility with a beta of 1.13 — expect wider price swings.

KEQU is growing revenue faster at 3.3% — sustainability is the question.

KEQU generates stronger free cash flow (11M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor FURNISHINGS, FIXTURES & APPLIANCES industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

WHR scores higher overall (52/100 vs 41/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Kewaunee Scientific Corporation

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · FURNISHINGS, FIXTURES & APPLIANCES · USA

Kewaunee Scientific Corporation designs, manufactures and installs laboratory, sanitary and technical furniture products. The company is headquartered in Statesville, North Carolina.

Whirlpool Corporation

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · FURNISHINGS, FIXTURES & APPLIANCES · USA

The Whirlpool Corporation is an American multinational manufacturer and marketer of home appliances, headquartered in Benton Charter Township, Michigan, United States.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?