WallStSmart

Kenon Holdings (KEN)vsWipro Limited ADR (WIT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Wipro Limited ADR generates 117285% more annual revenue ($908.92B vs $774.30M). KEN leads profitability with a 63.8% profit margin vs 14.6%. WIT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 53/100 (C-).

KEN

Hold

44

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 5.3Profit: 6.0Value: 5.0Quality: 9.0
Piotroski: 7/9Altman Z: 2.05

WIT

Buy

53

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.0Profit: 6.5Value: 7.3Quality: 7.3
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 3.52
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for KEN.

WITSignificantly Overvalued (-171.6%)

Margin of Safety

-171.6%

Fair Value

$0.88

Current Price

$2.09

$1.21 premium

UndervaluedFair: $0.88Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

KEN2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
63.8%10/10

Keeps 64 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Return on EquityProfitability
24.1%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 24 in profit

WIT4 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Free Cash FlowQuality
$37.93B10/10

Generating 37.9B in free cash flow

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.5210/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

P/E RatioValuation
16.1x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.3x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

KEN2 concerns · Avg: 1.5/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
-95.6%2/10

Earnings declined 95.6%

Operating MarginProfitability
-1.0%1/10

Operating margin of -1.0%

WIT2 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.434/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-7.2%2/10

Earnings declined 7.2%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : KEN

The strongest argument for KEN centers on Profit Margin, Return on Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 63.8% and operating margin at -1.0%.

Bull Case : WIT

The strongest argument for WIT centers on Free Cash Flow, Altman Z-Score, P/E Ratio.

Bear Case : KEN

The primary concerns for KEN are EPS Growth, Operating Margin.

Bear Case : WIT

The primary concerns for WIT are PEG Ratio, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

KEN profiles as a mature stock while WIT is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

KEN carries more volatility with a beta of 0.49 — expect wider price swings.

KEN is growing revenue faster at 8.3% — sustainability is the question.

WIT generates stronger free cash flow (37.9B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

WIT scores higher overall (53/100 vs 44/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Kenon Holdings

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

Kenon Holdings Ltd., is the owner, developer and operator of power generation facilities in Israel and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.

Visit Website →

Wipro Limited ADR

TECHNOLOGY · INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY SERVICES · USA

Wipro Limited is a global information technology (IT), consulting and business process services company. The company is headquartered in Bengaluru, India.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?