WallStSmart

Kenon Holdings (KEN)vsWells Fargo & Company (WFC)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Wells Fargo & Company generates 10237% more annual revenue ($80.04B vs $774.30M). KEN leads profitability with a 63.8% profit margin vs 26.7%. WFC earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 72/100 (B).

KEN

Hold

44

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 5.3Profit: 6.0Value: 5.0Quality: 9.0
Piotroski: 7/9Altman Z: 2.05

WFC

Strong Buy

72

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 6.7Profit: 7.5Value: 10.0Quality: 5.8
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 0.43
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for KEN.

WFCUndervalued (+53.8%)

Margin of Safety

+53.8%

Fair Value

$173.78

Current Price

$80.26

$93.52 discount

UndervaluedFair: $173.78Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

KEN2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
63.8%10/10

Keeps 64 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Return on EquityProfitability
24.1%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 24 in profit

WFC6 strengths · Avg: 8.5/10
Market CapQuality
$245.65B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Profit MarginProfitability
26.7%9/10

Keeps 27 of every $100 in revenue as profit

P/E RatioValuation
12.7x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
29.9%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 29.9%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$4.12B8/10

Generating 4.1B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

KEN2 concerns · Avg: 1.5/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
-95.6%2/10

Earnings declined 95.6%

Operating MarginProfitability
-1.0%1/10

Operating margin of -1.0%

WFC2 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.664/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.432/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : KEN

The strongest argument for KEN centers on Profit Margin, Return on Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 63.8% and operating margin at -1.0%.

Bull Case : WFC

The strongest argument for WFC centers on Market Cap, Profit Margin, P/E Ratio. Profitability is solid with margins at 26.7% and operating margin at 29.9%.

Bear Case : KEN

The primary concerns for KEN are EPS Growth, Operating Margin.

Bear Case : WFC

The primary concerns for WFC are PEG Ratio, Altman Z-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

KEN profiles as a mature stock while WFC is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

WFC carries more volatility with a beta of 1.07 — expect wider price swings.

KEN is growing revenue faster at 8.3% — sustainability is the question.

WFC generates stronger free cash flow (4.1B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

WFC scores higher overall (72/100 vs 44/100), backed by strong 26.7% margins. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Kenon Holdings

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

Kenon Holdings Ltd., is the owner, developer and operator of power generation facilities in Israel and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.

Visit Website →

Wells Fargo & Company

FINANCIAL SERVICES · BANKS - DIVERSIFIED · USA

Wells Fargo & Company is an American multinational financial services company with corporate headquarters in San Francisco, California, operational headquarters in Manhattan, and managerial offices throughout the United States and overseas.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?