WallStSmart

Kenon Holdings (KEN)vsWestinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corp (WAB)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corp generates 1342% more annual revenue ($11.17B vs $774.30M). KEN leads profitability with a 63.8% profit margin vs 10.5%. WAB earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 58/100 (C).

KEN

Hold

44

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 5.3Profit: 6.0Value: 5.0Quality: 9.0
Piotroski: 7/9Altman Z: 2.05

WAB

Buy

58

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 5.3Profit: 6.5Value: 7.3Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.68
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for KEN.

WABSignificantly Overvalued (-447.9%)

Margin of Safety

-447.9%

Fair Value

$46.44

Current Price

$248.32

$201.88 premium

UndervaluedFair: $46.44Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

KEN2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
63.8%10/10

Keeps 64 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Return on EquityProfitability
24.1%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 24 in profit

WAB0 strengths · Avg: 0/10

No standout strengths identified

Areas to Watch

KEN2 concerns · Avg: 1.5/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
-95.6%2/10

Earnings declined 95.6%

Operating MarginProfitability
-1.0%1/10

Operating margin of -1.0%

WAB4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
36.0x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.684/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EPS GrowthGrowth
-3.8%2/10

Earnings declined 3.8%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : KEN

The strongest argument for KEN centers on Profit Margin, Return on Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 63.8% and operating margin at -1.0%.

Bull Case : WAB

Revenue growth of 14.8% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.37 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : KEN

The primary concerns for KEN are EPS Growth, Operating Margin.

Bear Case : WAB

The primary concerns for WAB are P/E Ratio, Altman Z-Score, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

KEN profiles as a mature stock while WAB is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

WAB carries more volatility with a beta of 0.98 — expect wider price swings.

WAB is growing revenue faster at 14.8% — sustainability is the question.

WAB generates stronger free cash flow (870M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

WAB scores higher overall (58/100 vs 44/100) and 14.8% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Kenon Holdings

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

Kenon Holdings Ltd., is the owner, developer and operator of power generation facilities in Israel and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.

Visit Website →

Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corp

INDUSTRIALS · RAILROADS · USA

Wabtec Corporation (derived from Westinghouse Air Brake Technologies Corporation) is an American company formed by the merger of the Westinghouse Air Brake Company (WABCO) and MotivePower Industries Corporation in 1999. It is headquartered in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?