WallStSmart

Kenon Holdings (KEN)vsVerizon Communications Inc (VZ)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Verizon Communications Inc generates 17747% more annual revenue ($138.19B vs $774.30M). KEN leads profitability with a 63.8% profit margin vs 12.4%. VZ earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 62/100 (C+).

KEN

Hold

44

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 5.3Profit: 6.0Value: 5.0Quality: 9.0
Piotroski: 7/9Altman Z: 2.05

VZ

Buy

62

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 7.0Value: 7.3Quality: 3.8
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.11
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for KEN.

VZSignificantly Overvalued (-82.4%)

Margin of Safety

-82.4%

Fair Value

$27.61

Current Price

$50.37

$22.76 premium

UndervaluedFair: $27.61Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

KEN2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
63.8%10/10

Keeps 64 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Return on EquityProfitability
24.1%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 24 in profit

VZ5 strengths · Avg: 8.4/10
Market CapQuality
$214.72B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

P/E RatioValuation
12.5x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
21.0%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 21.0%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$4.37B8/10

Generating 4.4B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

KEN2 concerns · Avg: 1.5/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
-95.6%2/10

Earnings declined 95.6%

Operating MarginProfitability
-1.0%1/10

Operating margin of -1.0%

VZ4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
2.0%4/10

2.0% revenue growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EPS GrowthGrowth
-53.3%2/10

Earnings declined 53.3%

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.112/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : KEN

The strongest argument for KEN centers on Profit Margin, Return on Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 63.8% and operating margin at -1.0%.

Bull Case : VZ

The strongest argument for VZ centers on Market Cap, P/E Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 1.23 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : KEN

The primary concerns for KEN are EPS Growth, Operating Margin.

Bear Case : VZ

The primary concerns for VZ are Revenue Growth, Piotroski F-Score, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

KEN profiles as a mature stock while VZ is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

KEN carries more volatility with a beta of 0.49 — expect wider price swings.

KEN is growing revenue faster at 8.3% — sustainability is the question.

VZ generates stronger free cash flow (4.4B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

VZ scores higher overall (62/100 vs 44/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Kenon Holdings

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

Kenon Holdings Ltd., is the owner, developer and operator of power generation facilities in Israel and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.

Visit Website →

Verizon Communications Inc

COMMUNICATION SERVICES · TELECOM SERVICES · USA

Verizon Communications Inc. is an American multinational telecommunications conglomerate and a corporate component of the Dow Jones Industrial Average. The company is headquartered at 1095 Avenue of the Americas in Midtown Manhattan, New York City, but is incorporated in Delaware.

Compare with Other UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS Stocks

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?