WallStSmart

Kenon Holdings (KEN)vsUbiquiti Networks Inc (UI)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Ubiquiti Networks Inc generates 284% more annual revenue ($2.97B vs $774.30M). KEN leads profitability with a 63.8% profit margin vs 29.9%. UI earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 73/100 (B).

KEN

Hold

44

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 5.3Profit: 6.0Value: 5.0Quality: 9.0
Piotroski: 7/9Altman Z: 2.05

UI

Strong Buy

73

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 9.3Profit: 10.0Value: 5.3Quality: 7.3
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 5.14
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for KEN.

UIFair Value (-4.0%)

Margin of Safety

-4.0%

Fair Value

$685.62

Current Price

$839.05

$153.43 premium

UndervaluedFair: $685.62Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

KEN2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
63.8%10/10

Keeps 64 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Return on EquityProfitability
24.1%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 24 in profit

UI6 strengths · Avg: 9.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
136.1%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 136 in profit

Operating MarginProfitability
35.9%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 35.9%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
35.8%10/10

Revenue surging 35.8% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
70.8%10/10

Earnings expanding 70.8% YoY

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
5.1410/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Market CapQuality
$50.50B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Areas to Watch

KEN2 concerns · Avg: 1.5/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
-95.6%2/10

Earnings declined 95.6%

Operating MarginProfitability
-1.0%1/10

Operating margin of -1.0%

UI2 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
57.0x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
50.0x2/10

Trading at 50.0x book value

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : KEN

The strongest argument for KEN centers on Profit Margin, Return on Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 63.8% and operating margin at -1.0%.

Bull Case : UI

The strongest argument for UI centers on Return on Equity, Operating Margin, Revenue Growth. Profitability is solid with margins at 29.9% and operating margin at 35.9%. Revenue growth of 35.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : KEN

The primary concerns for KEN are EPS Growth, Operating Margin.

Bear Case : UI

The primary concerns for UI are P/E Ratio, Price/Book. A P/E of 57.0x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

KEN profiles as a mature stock while UI is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

UI carries more volatility with a beta of 1.37 — expect wider price swings.

UI is growing revenue faster at 35.8% — sustainability is the question.

UI generates stronger free cash flow (259M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

UI scores higher overall (73/100 vs 44/100), backed by strong 29.9% margins and 35.8% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Kenon Holdings

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

Kenon Holdings Ltd., is the owner, developer and operator of power generation facilities in Israel and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.

Visit Website →

Ubiquiti Networks Inc

TECHNOLOGY · COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT · USA

Ubiquiti Inc. develops network technology for service providers, businesses and consumers. The company is headquartered in New York, New York.

Compare with Other UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS Stocks

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?