WallStSmart

Kenon Holdings (KEN)vsUber Technologies Inc (UBER)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Uber Technologies Inc generates 6618% more annual revenue ($52.02B vs $774.30M). KEN leads profitability with a 63.8% profit margin vs 19.3%. UBER earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 56/100 (C).

KEN

Hold

44

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 5.3Profit: 6.0Value: 5.0Quality: 9.0
Piotroski: 7/9Altman Z: 2.05

UBER

Buy

56

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 6.0Profit: 7.5Value: 4.7Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.47
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for KEN.

UBERSignificantly Overvalued (-122.0%)

Margin of Safety

-122.0%

Fair Value

$32.16

Current Price

$73.08

$40.92 premium

UndervaluedFair: $32.16Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

KEN2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
63.8%10/10

Keeps 64 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Return on EquityProfitability
24.1%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 24 in profit

UBER5 strengths · Avg: 8.6/10
Return on EquityProfitability
39.9%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 40 in profit

Market CapQuality
$150.31B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

P/E RatioValuation
15.3x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Revenue GrowthGrowth
20.1%8/10

Revenue surging 20.1% year-over-year

Free Cash FlowQuality
$2.81B8/10

Generating 2.8B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

KEN2 concerns · Avg: 1.5/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
-95.6%2/10

Earnings declined 95.6%

Operating MarginProfitability
-1.0%1/10

Operating margin of -1.0%

UBER3 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
4.512/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-95.6%2/10

Earnings declined 95.6%

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.472/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : KEN

The strongest argument for KEN centers on Profit Margin, Return on Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 63.8% and operating margin at -1.0%.

Bull Case : UBER

The strongest argument for UBER centers on Return on Equity, Market Cap, P/E Ratio. Profitability is solid with margins at 19.3% and operating margin at 12.3%. Revenue growth of 20.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : KEN

The primary concerns for KEN are EPS Growth, Operating Margin.

Bear Case : UBER

The primary concerns for UBER are PEG Ratio, EPS Growth, Altman Z-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

KEN profiles as a mature stock while UBER is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

UBER carries more volatility with a beta of 1.22 — expect wider price swings.

UBER is growing revenue faster at 20.1% — sustainability is the question.

UBER generates stronger free cash flow (2.8B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

UBER scores higher overall (56/100 vs 44/100), backed by strong 19.3% margins and 20.1% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Kenon Holdings

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

Kenon Holdings Ltd., is the owner, developer and operator of power generation facilities in Israel and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.

Visit Website →

Uber Technologies Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - APPLICATION · USA

Uber Technologies, Inc., commonly known as Uber, is an American technology company. Its services include ride-hailing, food delivery (Uber Eats), package delivery, couriers, freight transportation, and, through a partnership with Lime, electric bicycle and motorized scooter rental. The company is based in San Francisco, California.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?