WallStSmart

Kenon Holdings (KEN)vsTrane Technologies plc (TT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Trane Technologies plc generates 2378% more annual revenue ($21.60B vs $871.93M). TT leads profitability with a 13.4% profit margin vs 7.6%. TT trades at a lower P/E of 37.2x. TT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 52/100 (C-).

KEN

Hold

40

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 6.7Profit: 4.5Value: 3.0Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.23

TT

Buy

52

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 5.3Profit: 8.0Value: 4.3Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 6/9
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

KENSignificantly Overvalued (-39.8%)

Margin of Safety

-39.8%

Fair Value

$54.56

Current Price

$91.99

$37.43 premium

UndervaluedFair: $54.56Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for TT.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

KEN1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
43.1%10/10

Revenue surging 43.1% year-over-year

TT2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
36.6%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 37 in profit

Market CapQuality
$107.57B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Areas to Watch

KEN4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
5.1%3/10

ROE of 5.1% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
7.6%3/10

7.6% margin — thin

P/E RatioValuation
69.1x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
-93.7%2/10

Earnings declined 93.7%

TT4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.394/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
37.2x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
12.6x4/10

Trading at 12.6x book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
-2.1%2/10

Earnings declined 2.1%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : KEN

The strongest argument for KEN centers on Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 43.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : TT

The strongest argument for TT centers on Return on Equity, Market Cap.

Bear Case : KEN

The primary concerns for KEN are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 69.1x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : TT

The primary concerns for TT are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Price/Book.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

KEN profiles as a hypergrowth stock while TT is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

TT carries more volatility with a beta of 1.21 — expect wider price swings.

KEN is growing revenue faster at 43.1% — sustainability is the question.

TT generates stronger free cash flow (542M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

TT scores higher overall (52/100 vs 40/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Kenon Holdings

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

Kenon Holdings Ltd., is the owner, developer and operator of power generation facilities in Israel and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.

Visit Website →

Trane Technologies plc

INDUSTRIALS · BUILDING PRODUCTS & EQUIPMENT · USA

Trane Technologies plc is an American Irish domiciled diversified industrial manufacturing company. It is headquartered near Dublin, Ireland.

Compare with Other UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS Stocks

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?