WallStSmart

Kenon Holdings (KEN)vsTC Energy Corp (TRP)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

TC Energy Corp generates 1868% more annual revenue ($15.24B vs $774.30M). KEN leads profitability with a 63.8% profit margin vs 23.1%. TRP earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 59/100 (C).

KEN

Hold

44

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 5.3Profit: 6.0Value: 5.0Quality: 9.0
Piotroski: 7/9Altman Z: 2.05

TRP

Buy

59

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 6.0Profit: 7.5Value: 4.7Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 0.48
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for KEN.

TRPSignificantly Overvalued (-216.8%)

Margin of Safety

-216.8%

Fair Value

$19.23

Current Price

$64.08

$44.85 premium

UndervaluedFair: $19.23Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

KEN2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
63.8%10/10

Keeps 64 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Return on EquityProfitability
24.1%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 24 in profit

TRP4 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Operating MarginProfitability
45.4%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 45.4%

Market CapQuality
$66.54B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Profit MarginProfitability
23.1%9/10

Keeps 23 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Revenue GrowthGrowth
16.5%8/10

16.5% revenue growth

Areas to Watch

KEN2 concerns · Avg: 1.5/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
-95.6%2/10

Earnings declined 95.6%

Operating MarginProfitability
-1.0%1/10

Operating margin of -1.0%

TRP4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
25.3x4/10

Moderate valuation

EPS GrowthGrowth
0.5%4/10

0.5% earnings growth

PEG RatioValuation
4.612/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.482/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : KEN

The strongest argument for KEN centers on Profit Margin, Return on Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 63.8% and operating margin at -1.0%.

Bull Case : TRP

The strongest argument for TRP centers on Operating Margin, Market Cap, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 23.1% and operating margin at 45.4%. Revenue growth of 16.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : KEN

The primary concerns for KEN are EPS Growth, Operating Margin.

Bear Case : TRP

The primary concerns for TRP are P/E Ratio, EPS Growth, PEG Ratio. Debt-to-equity of 2.23 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

KEN profiles as a mature stock while TRP is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

TRP carries more volatility with a beta of 1.00 — expect wider price swings.

TRP is growing revenue faster at 16.5% — sustainability is the question.

TRP generates stronger free cash flow (548M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

TRP scores higher overall (59/100 vs 44/100), backed by strong 23.1% margins and 16.5% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Kenon Holdings

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

Kenon Holdings Ltd., is the owner, developer and operator of power generation facilities in Israel and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.

Visit Website →

TC Energy Corp

ENERGY · OIL & GAS MIDSTREAM · USA

TC Energy Corporation is an energy infrastructure company in North America. The company is headquartered in Calgary, Canada.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?