WallStSmart

Kenon Holdings (KEN)vsSony Group Corp (SONY)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Sony Group Corp generates 1510377% more annual revenue ($13.17T vs $871.93M). KEN leads profitability with a 7.6% profit margin vs -1.6%. SONY trades at a lower P/E of 15.8x. SONY earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 47/100 (D+).

KEN

Hold

40

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 6.7Profit: 4.5Value: 3.0Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.23

SONY

Hold

47

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 5.0Value: 5.0Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

KENSignificantly Overvalued (-39.5%)

Margin of Safety

-39.5%

Fair Value

$54.68

Current Price

$88.89

$34.21 premium

UndervaluedFair: $54.68Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for SONY.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

KEN2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
43.1%10/10

Revenue surging 43.1% year-over-year

Price/BookValuation
2.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

SONY4 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Free Cash FlowQuality
$898.45B10/10

Generating 898.5B in free cash flow

Market CapQuality
$122.47B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

P/E RatioValuation
15.8x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.3x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

KEN4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
5.1%3/10

ROE of 5.1% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
7.6%3/10

7.6% margin — thin

P/E RatioValuation
68.0x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
-93.7%2/10

Earnings declined 93.7%

SONY3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
0.5%4/10

0.5% revenue growth

PEG RatioValuation
2.652/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Profit MarginProfitability
-1.6%1/10

Currently unprofitable

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : KEN

The strongest argument for KEN centers on Revenue Growth, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 43.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : SONY

The strongest argument for SONY centers on Free Cash Flow, Market Cap, P/E Ratio.

Bear Case : KEN

The primary concerns for KEN are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 68.0x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : SONY

The primary concerns for SONY are Revenue Growth, PEG Ratio, Profit Margin.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

KEN profiles as a hypergrowth stock while SONY is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

SONY carries more volatility with a beta of 0.72 — expect wider price swings.

KEN is growing revenue faster at 43.1% — sustainability is the question.

SONY generates stronger free cash flow (898.5B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

SONY scores higher overall (47/100 vs 40/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Kenon Holdings

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

Kenon Holdings Ltd., is the owner, developer and operator of power generation facilities in Israel and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.

Visit Website →

Sony Group Corp

TECHNOLOGY · CONSUMER ELECTRONICS · USA

Sony Group Corporation designs, develops, produces and sells electronic equipment, instruments and devices for the consumer, professional and industrial markets worldwide. The company is headquartered in Tokyo, Japan.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?