WallStSmart

Kenon Holdings (KEN)vsSonos Inc (SONO)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Sonos Inc generates 86% more annual revenue ($1.44B vs $774.30M). KEN leads profitability with a 63.8% profit margin vs -122.0%. KEN earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 44/100 (D).

KEN

Hold

44

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 5.3Profit: 6.0Value: 5.0Quality: 9.0
Piotroski: 7/9Altman Z: 2.05

SONO

Hold

42

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 4.7Profit: 4.0Value: 5.0Quality: 5.0

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

KEN2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
63.8%10/10

Keeps 64 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Return on EquityProfitability
24.1%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 24 in profit

SONO1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
87.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 87.5% YoY

Areas to Watch

KEN2 concerns · Avg: 1.5/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
-95.6%2/10

Earnings declined 95.6%

Operating MarginProfitability
-1.0%1/10

Operating margin of -1.0%

SONO4 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
Market CapQuality
$1.60B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
-3.9%2/10

ROE of -3.9% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-90.0%2/10

Revenue declined 90.0%

Profit MarginProfitability
-122.0%1/10

Currently unprofitable

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : KEN

The strongest argument for KEN centers on Profit Margin, Return on Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 63.8% and operating margin at -1.0%.

Bull Case : SONO

The strongest argument for SONO centers on EPS Growth.

Bear Case : KEN

The primary concerns for KEN are EPS Growth, Operating Margin.

Bear Case : SONO

The primary concerns for SONO are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Revenue Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

KEN profiles as a mature stock while SONO is a turnaround play — different risk/reward profiles.

SONO carries more volatility with a beta of 2.00 — expect wider price swings.

KEN is growing revenue faster at 8.3% — sustainability is the question.

SONO generates stronger free cash flow (157M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

KEN scores higher overall (44/100 vs 42/100), backed by strong 63.8% margins. Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Kenon Holdings

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

Kenon Holdings Ltd., is the owner, developer and operator of power generation facilities in Israel and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.

Visit Website →

Sonos Inc

TECHNOLOGY · CONSUMER ELECTRONICS · USA

Sonos, Inc. designs, develops, manufactures, and sells multi-room audio products in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa, and Asia Pacific. The company is headquartered in Santa Barbara, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?