WallStSmart

Kenon Holdings (KEN)vsSeaboard Corporation (SEB)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Seaboard Corporation generates 1168% more annual revenue ($9.82B vs $774.30M). KEN leads profitability with a 63.8% profit margin vs 4.0%. SEB earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 65/100 (B-).

KEN

Hold

44

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 5.3Profit: 6.0Value: 5.0Quality: 9.0
Piotroski: 7/9Altman Z: 2.05

SEB

Strong Buy

65

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 6.0Profit: 4.5Value: 10.0Quality: 8.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 3.59
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for KEN.

SEBUndervalued (+71.0%)

Margin of Safety

+71.0%

Fair Value

$19183.79

Current Price

$5405.30

$13778.49 discount

UndervaluedFair: $19183.79Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

KEN2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
63.8%10/10

Keeps 64 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Return on EquityProfitability
24.1%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 24 in profit

SEB5 strengths · Avg: 9.6/10
P/E RatioValuation
9.8x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.0x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
67.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 67.5% YoY

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.5910/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

PEG RatioValuation
0.658/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Areas to Watch

KEN2 concerns · Avg: 1.5/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
-95.6%2/10

Earnings declined 95.6%

Operating MarginProfitability
-1.0%1/10

Operating margin of -1.0%

SEB2 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Profit MarginProfitability
4.0%3/10

4.0% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
3.3%3/10

Operating margin of 3.3%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : KEN

The strongest argument for KEN centers on Profit Margin, Return on Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 63.8% and operating margin at -1.0%.

Bull Case : SEB

The strongest argument for SEB centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, EPS Growth. Revenue growth of 14.5% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.65 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : KEN

The primary concerns for KEN are EPS Growth, Operating Margin.

Bear Case : SEB

The primary concerns for SEB are Profit Margin, Operating Margin. Thin 4.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

KEN profiles as a mature stock while SEB is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

KEN carries more volatility with a beta of 0.49 — expect wider price swings.

SEB is growing revenue faster at 14.5% — sustainability is the question.

KEN generates stronger free cash flow (71M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

SEB scores higher overall (65/100 vs 44/100) and 14.5% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Kenon Holdings

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

Kenon Holdings Ltd., is the owner, developer and operator of power generation facilities in Israel and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.

Visit Website →

Seaboard Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · CONGLOMERATES · USA

Seaboard Corporation is a global agribusiness and transportation company. The company is headquartered in Merriam, Kansas.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?