WallStSmart

Kenon Holdings (KEN)vsRaytheon Technologies Corp (RTX)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Raytheon Technologies Corp generates 10265% more annual revenue ($90.37B vs $871.93M). RTX leads profitability with a 8.0% profit margin vs 7.6%. RTX trades at a lower P/E of 33.1x. RTX earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 59/100 (C).

KEN

Hold

40

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 6.7Profit: 4.5Value: 3.0Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.23

RTX

Buy

59

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 7.3Profit: 6.0Value: 3.3Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 1.55
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

KENSignificantly Overvalued (-39.5%)

Margin of Safety

-39.5%

Fair Value

$54.68

Current Price

$88.89

$34.21 premium

UndervaluedFair: $54.68Overvalued
RTXSignificantly Overvalued (-51.9%)

Margin of Safety

-51.9%

Fair Value

$116.35

Current Price

$176.09

$59.74 premium

UndervaluedFair: $116.35Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

KEN2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
43.1%10/10

Revenue surging 43.1% year-over-year

Price/BookValuation
2.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

RTX3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Market CapQuality
$238.07B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

EPS GrowthGrowth
32.5%8/10

Earnings expanding 32.5% YoY

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.21B8/10

Generating 1.2B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

KEN4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
5.1%3/10

ROE of 5.1% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
7.6%3/10

7.6% margin — thin

P/E RatioValuation
68.0x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
-93.7%2/10

Earnings declined 93.7%

RTX3 concerns · Avg: 4.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.434/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
33.1x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.554/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : KEN

The strongest argument for KEN centers on Revenue Growth, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 43.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : RTX

The strongest argument for RTX centers on Market Cap, EPS Growth, Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : KEN

The primary concerns for KEN are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 68.0x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : RTX

The primary concerns for RTX are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Altman Z-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

KEN profiles as a hypergrowth stock while RTX is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

KEN carries more volatility with a beta of 0.38 — expect wider price swings.

KEN is growing revenue faster at 43.1% — sustainability is the question.

RTX generates stronger free cash flow (1.2B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

RTX scores higher overall (59/100 vs 40/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Kenon Holdings

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

Kenon Holdings Ltd., is the owner, developer and operator of power generation facilities in Israel and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.

Visit Website →

Raytheon Technologies Corp

INDUSTRIALS · AEROSPACE & DEFENSE · USA

Raytheon Technologies Corporation is an American multinational aerospace and defense conglomerate headquartered in Waltham, Massachusetts. It is one of the largest aerospace, intelligence services providers, and defense manufacturers in the world by revenue and market capitalization. Raytheon Technologies (RTX) researches, develops, and manufactures advanced technology products in the aerospace and defense industry, including aircraft engines, avionics, aerostructures, cybersecurity, guided missiles, air defense systems, satellites, and drones.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?