WallStSmart

Kenon Holdings (KEN)vsQualcomm Incorporated (QCOM)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Qualcomm Incorporated generates 5694% more annual revenue ($44.87B vs $774.30M). KEN leads profitability with a 63.8% profit margin vs 12.0%. QCOM earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 61/100 (C+).

KEN

Hold

44

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 5.3Profit: 6.0Value: 5.0Quality: 9.0
Piotroski: 7/9Altman Z: 2.05

QCOM

Buy

61

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 4.7Profit: 8.0Value: 7.3Quality: 8.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 3.17
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for KEN.

QCOMSignificantly Overvalued (-285.6%)

Margin of Safety

-285.6%

Fair Value

$33.80

Current Price

$130.35

$96.55 premium

UndervaluedFair: $33.80Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

KEN2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
63.8%10/10

Keeps 64 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Return on EquityProfitability
24.1%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 24 in profit

QCOM6 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.1710/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Market CapQuality
$137.43B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
21.5%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 22 in profit

PEG RatioValuation
0.558/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Operating MarginProfitability
27.5%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 27.5%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$4.42B8/10

Generating 4.4B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

KEN2 concerns · Avg: 1.5/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
-95.6%2/10

Earnings declined 95.6%

Operating MarginProfitability
-1.0%1/10

Operating margin of -1.0%

QCOM2 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
25.9x4/10

Moderate valuation

EPS GrowthGrowth
-1.8%2/10

Earnings declined 1.8%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : KEN

The strongest argument for KEN centers on Profit Margin, Return on Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 63.8% and operating margin at -1.0%.

Bull Case : QCOM

The strongest argument for QCOM centers on Altman Z-Score, Market Cap, Return on Equity. PEG of 0.55 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : KEN

The primary concerns for KEN are EPS Growth, Operating Margin.

Bear Case : QCOM

The primary concerns for QCOM are P/E Ratio, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

KEN profiles as a mature stock while QCOM is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

QCOM carries more volatility with a beta of 1.27 — expect wider price swings.

KEN is growing revenue faster at 8.3% — sustainability is the question.

QCOM generates stronger free cash flow (4.4B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

QCOM scores higher overall (61/100 vs 44/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Kenon Holdings

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

Kenon Holdings Ltd., is the owner, developer and operator of power generation facilities in Israel and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.

Visit Website →

Qualcomm Incorporated

TECHNOLOGY · SEMICONDUCTORS · USA

Qualcomm is an American multinational corporation headquartered in San Diego, California, and incorporated in Delaware. It creates semiconductors, software, and services related to wireless technology. It owns patents critical to the 5G, 4G, CDMA2000, TD-SCDMA and WCDMA mobile communications standards.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?