WallStSmart

Kenon Holdings (KEN)vsQnity Electronics, Inc (Q)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Qnity Electronics, Inc generates 445% more annual revenue ($4.75B vs $871.93M). Q leads profitability with a 14.6% profit margin vs 7.6%. Q trades at a lower P/E of 43.5x. Q earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 49/100 (D+).

KEN

Hold

40

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 6.7Profit: 4.5Value: 3.0Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.23

Q

Hold

49

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 3.3Profit: 6.0Value: 3.3Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

KENSignificantly Overvalued (-39.5%)

Margin of Safety

-39.5%

Fair Value

$54.68

Current Price

$88.89

$34.21 premium

UndervaluedFair: $54.68Overvalued
QOvervalued (-9.0%)

Margin of Safety

-9.0%

Fair Value

$105.09

Current Price

$143.59

$38.50 premium

UndervaluedFair: $105.09Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

KEN2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
43.1%10/10

Revenue surging 43.1% year-over-year

Price/BookValuation
2.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Q1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Operating MarginProfitability
20.4%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 20.4%

Areas to Watch

KEN4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
5.1%3/10

ROE of 5.1% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
7.6%3/10

7.6% margin — thin

P/E RatioValuation
68.0x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
-93.7%2/10

Earnings declined 93.7%

Q4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Return on EquityProfitability
8.0%3/10

ROE of 8.0% — below average capital efficiency

PEG RatioValuation
2.862/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
43.5x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
-52.8%2/10

Earnings declined 52.8%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : KEN

The strongest argument for KEN centers on Revenue Growth, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 43.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : Q

The strongest argument for Q centers on Operating Margin.

Bear Case : KEN

The primary concerns for KEN are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 68.0x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : Q

The primary concerns for Q are Return on Equity, PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 43.5x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

KEN profiles as a hypergrowth stock while Q is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

KEN is growing revenue faster at 43.1% — sustainability is the question.

Q generates stronger free cash flow (420M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

Q scores higher overall (49/100 vs 40/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Kenon Holdings

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

Kenon Holdings Ltd., is the owner, developer and operator of power generation facilities in Israel and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.

Visit Website →

Qnity Electronics, Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SEMICONDUCTOR EQUIPMENT & MATERIALS · USA

IQVIA Holdings Inc. provides integrated information and technology-enabled healthcare services in the Americas, Europe, Africa, and Asia-Pacific. The company is headquartered in Durham, North Carolina.

Compare with Other UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS Stocks

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?