WallStSmart

Kenon Holdings (KEN)vsQuanta Services Inc (PWR)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Quanta Services Inc generates 3355% more annual revenue ($30.12B vs $871.93M). KEN leads profitability with a 7.6% profit margin vs 3.7%. KEN trades at a lower P/E of 69.1x. PWR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 54/100 (C-).

KEN

Hold

40

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 6.7Profit: 4.5Value: 3.0Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.23

PWR

Buy

54

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 8.7Profit: 5.0Value: 3.7Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

KENSignificantly Overvalued (-39.8%)

Margin of Safety

-39.8%

Fair Value

$54.56

Current Price

$91.99

$37.43 premium

UndervaluedFair: $54.56Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for PWR.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

KEN1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
43.1%10/10

Revenue surging 43.1% year-over-year

PWR3 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
51.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 51.0% YoY

Market CapQuality
$113.65B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Revenue GrowthGrowth
26.3%8/10

Revenue surging 26.3% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

KEN4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
5.1%3/10

ROE of 5.1% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
7.6%3/10

7.6% margin — thin

P/E RatioValuation
69.1x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
-93.7%2/10

Earnings declined 93.7%

PWR4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.434/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
13.1x4/10

Trading at 13.1x book value

Profit MarginProfitability
3.7%3/10

3.7% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
4.2%3/10

Operating margin of 4.2%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : KEN

The strongest argument for KEN centers on Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 43.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : PWR

The strongest argument for PWR centers on EPS Growth, Market Cap, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 26.3% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : KEN

The primary concerns for KEN are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 69.1x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : PWR

The primary concerns for PWR are PEG Ratio, Price/Book, Profit Margin. A P/E of 102.1x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 3.7% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

KEN profiles as a hypergrowth stock while PWR is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

PWR carries more volatility with a beta of 1.24 — expect wider price swings.

KEN is growing revenue faster at 43.1% — sustainability is the question.

PWR generates stronger free cash flow (172M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

PWR scores higher overall (54/100 vs 40/100) and 26.3% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Kenon Holdings

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

Kenon Holdings Ltd., is the owner, developer and operator of power generation facilities in Israel and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.

Visit Website →

Quanta Services Inc

INDUSTRIALS · ENGINEERING & CONSTRUCTION · USA

Quanta Services is an American corporation that provides infrastructure services for electric power, pipeline, industrial and communications industries. Capabilities include the planning, design, installation, program management, maintenance and repair of most types of network infrastructure.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?