WallStSmart

Kenon Holdings (KEN)vsPortland General Electric Co (POR)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Portland General Electric Co generates 305% more annual revenue ($3.53B vs $871.93M). KEN leads profitability with a 7.6% profit margin vs 7.1%. POR trades at a lower P/E of 21.7x. POR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 50/100 (D+).

KEN

Hold

40

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 6.7Profit: 4.5Value: 3.0Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.23

POR

Hold

50

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 3.3Profit: 4.5Value: 6.7Quality: 3.8
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 0.85
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

KENSignificantly Overvalued (-39.5%)

Margin of Safety

-39.5%

Fair Value

$54.68

Current Price

$88.89

$34.21 premium

UndervaluedFair: $54.68Overvalued
PORUndervalued (+37.4%)

Margin of Safety

+37.4%

Fair Value

$82.59

Current Price

$48.51

$34.08 discount

UndervaluedFair: $82.59Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

KEN2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
43.1%10/10

Revenue surging 43.1% year-over-year

Price/BookValuation
2.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

POR1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.4x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

KEN4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
5.1%3/10

ROE of 5.1% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
7.6%3/10

7.6% margin — thin

P/E RatioValuation
68.0x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
-93.7%2/10

Earnings declined 93.7%

POR4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.764/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Return on EquityProfitability
6.3%3/10

ROE of 6.3% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
7.1%3/10

7.1% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : KEN

The strongest argument for KEN centers on Revenue Growth, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 43.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : POR

The strongest argument for POR centers on Price/Book.

Bear Case : KEN

The primary concerns for KEN are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 68.0x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : POR

The primary concerns for POR are PEG Ratio, Return on Equity, Profit Margin.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

KEN profiles as a hypergrowth stock while POR is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

POR carries more volatility with a beta of 0.56 — expect wider price swings.

KEN is growing revenue faster at 43.1% — sustainability is the question.

KEN generates stronger free cash flow (53M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

POR scores higher overall (50/100 vs 40/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Kenon Holdings

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

Kenon Holdings Ltd., is the owner, developer and operator of power generation facilities in Israel and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.

Visit Website →

Portland General Electric Co

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED ELECTRIC · USA

Portland General Electric Company, an integrated electric utility company, is engaged in the generation, wholesaling, transmission, distribution and retail of electricity in the state of Oregon. The company is headquartered in Portland, Oregon.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?