WallStSmart

Kenon Holdings (KEN)vsParker-Hannifin Corporation (PH)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Parker-Hannifin Corporation generates 2543% more annual revenue ($20.46B vs $774.30M). KEN leads profitability with a 63.8% profit margin vs 17.3%. PH earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 54/100 (C-).

KEN

Hold

44

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 5.3Profit: 6.0Value: 5.0Quality: 9.0
Piotroski: 7/9Altman Z: 2.05

PH

Buy

54

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 8.5Value: 4.7Quality: 5.8
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.78
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for KEN.

PHSignificantly Overvalued (-435.1%)

Margin of Safety

-435.1%

Fair Value

$186.12

Current Price

$921.56

$735.44 premium

UndervaluedFair: $186.12Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

KEN2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
63.8%10/10

Keeps 64 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Return on EquityProfitability
24.1%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 24 in profit

PH3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Market CapQuality
$116.70B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
25.8%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 26 in profit

Operating MarginProfitability
21.7%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 21.7%

Areas to Watch

KEN2 concerns · Avg: 1.5/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
-95.6%2/10

Earnings declined 95.6%

Operating MarginProfitability
-1.0%1/10

Operating margin of -1.0%

PH4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
33.8x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Price/BookValuation
8.1x4/10

Trading at 8.1x book value

PEG RatioValuation
3.632/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-9.0%2/10

Earnings declined 9.0%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : KEN

The strongest argument for KEN centers on Profit Margin, Return on Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 63.8% and operating margin at -1.0%.

Bull Case : PH

The strongest argument for PH centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 17.3% and operating margin at 21.7%.

Bear Case : KEN

The primary concerns for KEN are EPS Growth, Operating Margin.

Bear Case : PH

The primary concerns for PH are P/E Ratio, Price/Book, PEG Ratio.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

PH carries more volatility with a beta of 1.22 — expect wider price swings.

PH is growing revenue faster at 9.1% — sustainability is the question.

PH generates stronger free cash flow (768M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

PH scores higher overall (54/100 vs 44/100), backed by strong 17.3% margins. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Kenon Holdings

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

Kenon Holdings Ltd., is the owner, developer and operator of power generation facilities in Israel and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.

Visit Website →

Parker-Hannifin Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · SPECIALTY INDUSTRIAL MACHINERY · USA

Parker-Hannifin Corporation, originally Parker Appliance Company, usually referred to as just Parker, is an American corporation specializing in motion and control technologies. Its corporate headquarters are in Mayfield Heights, Ohio, in Greater Cleveland.

Compare with Other UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS Stocks

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?