WallStSmart

Kenon Holdings (KEN)vsPepsiCo Inc (PEP)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

PepsiCo Inc generates 12030% more annual revenue ($93.92B vs $774.30M). KEN leads profitability with a 63.8% profit margin vs 8.8%. PEP earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 59/100 (C).

KEN

Hold

44

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 5.3Profit: 6.0Value: 5.0Quality: 9.0
Piotroski: 7/9Altman Z: 2.05

PEP

Buy

59

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 6.7Profit: 7.5Value: 7.3Quality: 4.8
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.26
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for KEN.

PEPUndervalued (+45.9%)

Margin of Safety

+45.9%

Fair Value

$280.33

Current Price

$151.73

$128.60 discount

UndervaluedFair: $280.33Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

KEN2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
63.8%10/10

Keeps 64 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Return on EquityProfitability
24.1%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 24 in profit

PEP4 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Market CapQuality
$205.91B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Return on EquityProfitability
42.8%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 43 in profit

EPS GrowthGrowth
67.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 67.5% YoY

Free Cash FlowQuality
$4.70B8/10

Generating 4.7B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

KEN2 concerns · Avg: 1.5/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
-95.6%2/10

Earnings declined 95.6%

Operating MarginProfitability
-1.0%1/10

Operating margin of -1.0%

PEP4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
25.1x4/10

Moderate valuation

Price/BookValuation
10.2x4/10

Trading at 10.2x book value

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
3.012/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : KEN

The strongest argument for KEN centers on Profit Margin, Return on Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 63.8% and operating margin at -1.0%.

Bull Case : PEP

The strongest argument for PEP centers on Market Cap, Return on Equity, EPS Growth.

Bear Case : KEN

The primary concerns for KEN are EPS Growth, Operating Margin.

Bear Case : PEP

The primary concerns for PEP are P/E Ratio, Price/Book, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

KEN profiles as a mature stock while PEP is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

KEN carries more volatility with a beta of 0.49 — expect wider price swings.

KEN is growing revenue faster at 8.3% — sustainability is the question.

PEP generates stronger free cash flow (4.7B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

PEP scores higher overall (59/100 vs 44/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Kenon Holdings

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

Kenon Holdings Ltd., is the owner, developer and operator of power generation facilities in Israel and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.

Visit Website →

PepsiCo Inc

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · BEVERAGES - NON-ALCOHOLIC · USA

PepsiCo, Inc. is an American based multinational food, snack, and beverage corporation headquartered in Harrison, New York, in the hamlet of Purchase. PepsiCo's business encompasses all aspects of the food and beverage market. It oversees the manufacturing, distribution, and marketing of its products.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?