WallStSmart

Kenon Holdings (KEN)vsOshkosh Corporation (OSK)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Oshkosh Corporation generates 1095% more annual revenue ($10.42B vs $871.93M). KEN leads profitability with a 7.6% profit margin vs 6.2%. OSK trades at a lower P/E of 15.3x. OSK earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 48/100 (D+).

KEN

Hold

40

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 6.7Profit: 4.5Value: 3.0Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.23

OSK

Hold

48

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 3.3Profit: 5.5Value: 6.7Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 2.82
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

KENSignificantly Overvalued (-39.5%)

Margin of Safety

-39.5%

Fair Value

$54.68

Current Price

$88.89

$34.21 premium

UndervaluedFair: $54.68Overvalued
OSKUndervalued (+33.0%)

Margin of Safety

+33.0%

Fair Value

$260.30

Current Price

$137.97

$122.33 discount

UndervaluedFair: $260.30Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

KEN2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
43.1%10/10

Revenue surging 43.1% year-over-year

Price/BookValuation
2.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

OSK2 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
15.3x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
1.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

KEN4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
5.1%3/10

ROE of 5.1% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
7.6%3/10

7.6% margin — thin

P/E RatioValuation
68.0x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
-93.7%2/10

Earnings declined 93.7%

OSK4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
3.5%4/10

3.5% revenue growth

Profit MarginProfitability
6.2%3/10

6.2% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
6.302/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : KEN

The strongest argument for KEN centers on Revenue Growth, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 43.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : OSK

The strongest argument for OSK centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book.

Bear Case : KEN

The primary concerns for KEN are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 68.0x leaves little room for execution misses.

Bear Case : OSK

The primary concerns for OSK are Revenue Growth, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

KEN profiles as a hypergrowth stock while OSK is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

OSK carries more volatility with a beta of 1.33 — expect wider price swings.

KEN is growing revenue faster at 43.1% — sustainability is the question.

OSK generates stronger free cash flow (526M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

OSK scores higher overall (48/100 vs 40/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Kenon Holdings

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

Kenon Holdings Ltd., is the owner, developer and operator of power generation facilities in Israel and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.

Visit Website →

Oshkosh Corporation

INDUSTRIALS · FARM & HEAVY CONSTRUCTION MACHINERY · USA

Oshkosh Corporation designs, manufactures and markets specialty vehicles and bodies worldwide. The company is headquartered in Oshkosh, Wisconsin.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?