Kenon Holdings (KEN)vsOPAL Fuels Inc (OPAL)
KEN
Kenon Holdings
$87.72
-0.97%
UTILITIES · Cap: $4.57B
OPAL
OPAL Fuels Inc
$2.16
+3.85%
UTILITIES · Cap: $66.79M
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Kenon Holdings generates 150% more annual revenue ($871.93M vs $348.98M). KEN leads profitability with a 7.6% profit margin vs 4.2%. OPAL trades at a lower P/E of 14.7x. KEN earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 40/100 (F).
KEN
Hold40
out of 100
Grade: F
OPAL
Hold38
out of 100
Grade: F
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
-40.1%
Fair Value
$54.44
Current Price
$87.72
$33.28 premium
Margin of Safety
+88.1%
Fair Value
$19.86
Current Price
$2.16
$17.70 discount
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Revenue surging 43.1% year-over-year
Reasonable price relative to book value
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Revenue surging 24.7% year-over-year
Areas to Watch
ROE of 5.1% — below average capital efficiency
7.6% margin — thin
Premium valuation, high expectations priced in
Earnings declined 93.7%
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
ROE of 7.6% — below average capital efficiency
4.2% margin — thin
Weak financial health signals
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : KEN
The strongest argument for KEN centers on Revenue Growth, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 43.1% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bull Case : OPAL
The strongest argument for OPAL centers on P/E Ratio, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 24.7% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bear Case : KEN
The primary concerns for KEN are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 69.1x leaves little room for execution misses.
Bear Case : OPAL
The primary concerns for OPAL are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. Debt-to-equity of 47.27 is elevated, increasing financial risk. Thin 4.2% margins leave little buffer for downturns.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
KEN profiles as a hypergrowth stock while OPAL is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.
OPAL carries more volatility with a beta of 0.93 — expect wider price swings.
KEN is growing revenue faster at 43.1% — sustainability is the question.
KEN generates stronger free cash flow (53M), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
KEN scores higher overall (40/100 vs 38/100) and 43.1% revenue growth. OPAL offers better value entry with a 88.1% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Kenon Holdings
UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA
Kenon Holdings Ltd., is the owner, developer and operator of power generation facilities in Israel and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.
Visit Website →OPAL Fuels Inc
UTILITIES · UTILITIES - REGULATED GAS · USA
OPAL Fuels Inc. is a prominent player in the renewable natural gas industry, dedicated to converting organic waste into sustainable energy solutions that support the transition to a low-carbon economy. The company operates a diverse portfolio of RNG production facilities and has established strategic partnerships that enhance its competitive position within the market. With a strong focus on leveraging advanced technologies and innovative practices, OPAL Fuels is poised to capitalize on the rising demand for eco-friendly energy alternatives, demonstrating its commitment to generating substantial value in the dynamic energy sector.
Visit Website →Compare with Other UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?