Kenon Holdings (KEN)vsNokia Corp ADR (NOK)
KEN
Kenon Holdings
$88.89
+2.95%
UTILITIES · Cap: $4.50B
NOK
Nokia Corp ADR
$12.35
-6.37%
TECHNOLOGY · Cap: $74.25B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Nokia Corp ADR generates 2193% more annual revenue ($20.00B vs $871.93M). KEN leads profitability with a 7.6% profit margin vs 4.0%. KEN trades at a lower P/E of 68.0x. NOK earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 40/100 (F).
KEN
Hold40
out of 100
Grade: F
NOK
Hold40
out of 100
Grade: F
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
-39.5%
Fair Value
$54.68
Current Price
$88.89
$34.21 premium
Margin of Safety
+16.7%
Fair Value
$8.81
Current Price
$12.35
$3.54 discount
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Revenue surging 43.1% year-over-year
Reasonable price relative to book value
Large-cap with strong market position
Conservative balance sheet, low leverage
Reasonable price relative to book value
Areas to Watch
ROE of 5.1% — below average capital efficiency
7.6% margin — thin
Premium valuation, high expectations priced in
Earnings declined 93.7%
2.4% revenue growth
Distress zone — elevated risk
ROE of 3.7% — below average capital efficiency
4.0% margin — thin
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : KEN
The strongest argument for KEN centers on Revenue Growth, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 43.1% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bull Case : NOK
The strongest argument for NOK centers on Market Cap, Debt/Equity, Price/Book. PEG of 1.15 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bear Case : KEN
The primary concerns for KEN are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 68.0x leaves little room for execution misses.
Bear Case : NOK
The primary concerns for NOK are Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity. A P/E of 83.1x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 4.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
KEN profiles as a hypergrowth stock while NOK is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.
NOK carries more volatility with a beta of 0.77 — expect wider price swings.
KEN is growing revenue faster at 43.1% — sustainability is the question.
NOK generates stronger free cash flow (629M), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
KEN scores higher overall (40/100 vs 40/100) and 43.1% revenue growth. NOK offers better value entry with a 16.7% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Kenon Holdings
UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA
Kenon Holdings Ltd., is the owner, developer and operator of power generation facilities in Israel and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.
Visit Website →Nokia Corp ADR
TECHNOLOGY · COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT · USA
Nokia Corporation offers fixed and mobile network solutions globally. The company is headquartered in Espoo, Finland.
Visit Website →Compare with Other UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?