WallStSmart

Johnson Outdoors Inc (JOUT)vsMattel Inc (MAT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Mattel Inc generates 726% more annual revenue ($5.38B vs $651.83M). MAT leads profitability with a 9.3% profit margin vs -2.3%. MAT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.15. JOUT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 60/100 (C).

JOUT

Buy

60

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 6.7Profit: 3.5Value: 4.3Quality: 8.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 3.63

MAT

Buy

58

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 2.7Profit: 5.5Value: 8.0Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.56
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

JOUTSignificantly Overvalued (-30.4%)

Margin of Safety

-30.4%

Fair Value

$37.47

Current Price

$47.35

$9.88 premium

UndervaluedFair: $37.47Overvalued
MATUndervalued (+21.1%)

Margin of Safety

+21.1%

Fair Value

$20.02

Current Price

$15.37

$4.65 discount

UndervaluedFair: $20.02Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

JOUT5 strengths · Avg: 9.4/10
Price/BookValuation
1.2x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
304.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 304.5% YoY

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.6310/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Debt/EquityHealth
0.119/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Revenue GrowthGrowth
15.5%8/10

15.5% revenue growth

MAT3 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
9.1x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Return on EquityProfitability
23.7%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 24 in profit

Price/BookValuation
2.1x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

JOUT4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$481.73M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-3.6%2/10

ROE of -3.6% — below average capital efficiency

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-18.49M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

MAT4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.3%4/10

4.3% revenue growth

Debt/EquityHealth
1.233/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EPS GrowthGrowth
-18.5%2/10

Earnings declined 18.5%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : JOUT

The strongest argument for JOUT centers on Price/Book, EPS Growth, Altman Z-Score. Revenue growth of 15.5% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.40 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : MAT

The strongest argument for MAT centers on P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Price/Book. PEG of 1.15 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : JOUT

The primary concerns for JOUT are Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : MAT

The primary concerns for MAT are Revenue Growth, Debt/Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

JOUT profiles as a growth stock while MAT is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

JOUT carries more volatility with a beta of 0.81 — expect wider price swings.

JOUT is growing revenue faster at 15.5% — sustainability is the question.

JOUT generates stronger free cash flow (-18M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

JOUT scores higher overall (60/100 vs 58/100) and 15.5% revenue growth. MAT offers better value entry with a 21.1% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Johnson Outdoors Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · LEISURE · USA

Johnson Outdoors Inc. designs, manufactures and markets camping, diving, watercraft and marine electronics products globally. The company is headquartered in Racine, Wisconsin.

Visit Website →

Mattel Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · LEISURE · USA

Mattel, Inc., a children's entertainment company, designs and produces toys and consumer products worldwide. The company is headquartered in El Segundo, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?