WallStSmart

Jamf Holding (JAMF)vsUber Technologies Inc (UBER)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Uber Technologies Inc generates 7674% more annual revenue ($53.69B vs $690.59M). UBER leads profitability with a 15.9% profit margin vs -0.1%. UBER earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 54/100 (C-).

JAMF

Hold

35

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 5.3Profit: 2.5Value: 6.7Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 0.29

UBER

Buy

54

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 5.3Profit: 7.5Value: 6.0Quality: 5.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.47
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

JAMFUndervalued (+61.1%)

Margin of Safety

+61.1%

Fair Value

$33.55

Current Price

$13.05

$20.50 discount

UndervaluedFair: $33.55Overvalued
UBERUndervalued (+34.2%)

Margin of Safety

+34.2%

Fair Value

$108.42

Current Price

$75.45

$32.97 discount

UndervaluedFair: $108.42Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

JAMF1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
2.2x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

UBER3 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
35.3%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 35 in profit

Market CapQuality
$156.19B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Free Cash FlowQuality
$2.29B8/10

Generating 2.3B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

JAMF4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
0.2%4/10

0.2% revenue growth

EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$1.75B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Operating MarginProfitability
0.0%3/10

Operating margin of 0.0%

UBER3 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
4.512/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-84.6%2/10

Earnings declined 84.6%

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.472/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : JAMF

The strongest argument for JAMF centers on Price/Book.

Bull Case : UBER

The strongest argument for UBER centers on Return on Equity, Market Cap, Free Cash Flow. Profitability is solid with margins at 15.9% and operating margin at 14.6%. Revenue growth of 14.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : JAMF

The primary concerns for JAMF are Revenue Growth, EPS Growth, Market Cap.

Bear Case : UBER

The primary concerns for UBER are PEG Ratio, EPS Growth, Altman Z-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

JAMF profiles as a turnaround stock while UBER is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

UBER carries more volatility with a beta of 1.16 — expect wider price swings.

UBER is growing revenue faster at 14.5% — sustainability is the question.

UBER generates stronger free cash flow (2.3B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

UBER scores higher overall (54/100 vs 35/100), backed by strong 15.9% margins and 14.5% revenue growth. JAMF offers better value entry with a 61.1% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Jamf Holding

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - APPLICATION · USA

Jamf Holding Corp. The company is headquartered in Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Visit Website →

Uber Technologies Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - APPLICATION · USA

Uber Technologies, Inc., commonly known as Uber, is an American technology company. Its services include ride-hailing, food delivery (Uber Eats), package delivery, couriers, freight transportation, and, through a partnership with Lime, electric bicycle and motorized scooter rental. The company is based in San Francisco, California.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?