WallStSmart

Interactive Brokers Group Inc (IBKR)vsNokia Corp ADR (NOK)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Nokia Corp ADR generates 210% more annual revenue ($20.00B vs $6.45B). IBKR leads profitability with a 16.1% profit margin vs 4.0%. NOK appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.15. IBKR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 64/100 (C+).

IBKR

Buy

64

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 8.7Profit: 7.5Value: 4.3Quality: 5.3
Piotroski: 2/9

NOK

Hold

40

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.7Profit: 4.5Value: 5.3Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.65
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for IBKR.

NOKUndervalued (+16.7%)

Margin of Safety

+16.7%

Fair Value

$8.81

Current Price

$12.35

$3.54 discount

UndervaluedFair: $8.81Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

IBKR6 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Operating MarginProfitability
76.8%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 76.8%

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0010/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Market CapQuality
$143.52B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
23.6%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 24 in profit

Revenue GrowthGrowth
16.8%8/10

16.8% revenue growth

EPS GrowthGrowth
21.6%8/10

Earnings expanding 21.6% YoY

NOK3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Market CapQuality
$74.25B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Debt/EquityHealth
0.259/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Price/BookValuation
2.8x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

IBKR3 concerns · Avg: 3.7/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.354/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
36.2x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

NOK4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
2.4%4/10

2.4% revenue growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.654/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Return on EquityProfitability
3.7%3/10

ROE of 3.7% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
4.0%3/10

4.0% margin — thin

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : IBKR

The strongest argument for IBKR centers on Operating Margin, Debt/Equity, Market Cap. Profitability is solid with margins at 16.1% and operating margin at 76.8%. Revenue growth of 16.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : NOK

The strongest argument for NOK centers on Market Cap, Debt/Equity, Price/Book. PEG of 1.15 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : IBKR

The primary concerns for IBKR are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : NOK

The primary concerns for NOK are Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity. A P/E of 83.1x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 4.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

IBKR profiles as a growth stock while NOK is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

IBKR carries more volatility with a beta of 1.32 — expect wider price swings.

IBKR is growing revenue faster at 16.8% — sustainability is the question.

Monitor CAPITAL MARKETS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

IBKR scores higher overall (64/100 vs 40/100), backed by strong 16.1% margins and 16.8% revenue growth. NOK offers better value entry with a 16.7% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Interactive Brokers Group Inc

FINANCIAL SERVICES · CAPITAL MARKETS · USA

Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. is a global automated electronic broker. The company is headquartered in Greenwich, Connecticut.

Nokia Corp ADR

TECHNOLOGY · COMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT · USA

Nokia Corporation offers fixed and mobile network solutions globally. The company is headquartered in Espoo, Finland.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?