WallStSmart

Interactive Brokers Group Inc (IBKR)vsKenon Holdings (KEN)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Interactive Brokers Group Inc generates 639% more annual revenue ($6.45B vs $871.93M). IBKR leads profitability with a 16.1% profit margin vs 7.6%. IBKR trades at a lower P/E of 36.2x. IBKR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 64/100 (C+).

IBKR

Buy

64

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 8.7Profit: 7.5Value: 4.3Quality: 5.3
Piotroski: 2/9

KEN

Hold

40

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 6.7Profit: 4.5Value: 3.0Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.23
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for IBKR.

KENSignificantly Overvalued (-39.5%)

Margin of Safety

-39.5%

Fair Value

$54.68

Current Price

$88.89

$34.21 premium

UndervaluedFair: $54.68Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

IBKR6 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Operating MarginProfitability
76.8%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 76.8%

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0010/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Market CapQuality
$143.52B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Return on EquityProfitability
23.6%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 24 in profit

Revenue GrowthGrowth
16.8%8/10

16.8% revenue growth

EPS GrowthGrowth
21.6%8/10

Earnings expanding 21.6% YoY

KEN2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
43.1%10/10

Revenue surging 43.1% year-over-year

Price/BookValuation
2.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

IBKR3 concerns · Avg: 3.7/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.354/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
36.2x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

KEN4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
5.1%3/10

ROE of 5.1% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
7.6%3/10

7.6% margin — thin

P/E RatioValuation
68.0x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
-93.7%2/10

Earnings declined 93.7%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : IBKR

The strongest argument for IBKR centers on Operating Margin, Debt/Equity, Market Cap. Profitability is solid with margins at 16.1% and operating margin at 76.8%. Revenue growth of 16.8% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : KEN

The strongest argument for KEN centers on Revenue Growth, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 43.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : IBKR

The primary concerns for IBKR are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : KEN

The primary concerns for KEN are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 68.0x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

IBKR profiles as a growth stock while KEN is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

IBKR carries more volatility with a beta of 1.32 — expect wider price swings.

KEN is growing revenue faster at 43.1% — sustainability is the question.

Monitor CAPITAL MARKETS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

IBKR scores higher overall (64/100 vs 40/100), backed by strong 16.1% margins and 16.8% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Interactive Brokers Group Inc

FINANCIAL SERVICES · CAPITAL MARKETS · USA

Interactive Brokers Group, Inc. is a global automated electronic broker. The company is headquartered in Greenwich, Connecticut.

Kenon Holdings

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

Kenon Holdings Ltd., is the owner, developer and operator of power generation facilities in Israel and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?