WallStSmart

Hooker Furniture Corporation (HOFT)vsWhirlpool Corporation (WHR)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Whirlpool Corporation generates 5356% more annual revenue ($15.18B vs $278.14M). WHR leads profitability with a 1.1% profit margin vs -9.7%. WHR appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.04. HOFT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 53/100 (C-).

HOFT

Buy

53

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 4.7Profit: 2.0Value: 5.0Quality: 9.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 3.88

WHR

Buy

52

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 2.0Profit: 4.0Value: 6.3Quality: 3.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.26
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

HOFTOvervalued (-10.3%)

Margin of Safety

-10.3%

Fair Value

$13.81

Current Price

$12.85

$0.96 premium

UndervaluedFair: $13.81Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for WHR.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

HOFT4 strengths · Avg: 9.8/10
Price/BookValuation
0.8x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
57.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 57.5% YoY

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
3.8810/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Debt/EquityHealth
0.179/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

WHR2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.7x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

P/E RatioValuation
14.5x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Areas to Watch

HOFT4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Market CapQuality
$138.49M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
-15.9%2/10

ROE of -15.9% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-20.5%2/10

Revenue declined 20.5%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-3.18M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

WHR4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
4.3%3/10

ROE of 4.3% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
1.1%3/10

1.1% margin — thin

Operating MarginProfitability
1.3%3/10

Operating margin of 1.3%

Debt/EquityHealth
1.883/10

Elevated debt levels

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : HOFT

The strongest argument for HOFT centers on Price/Book, EPS Growth, Altman Z-Score. PEG of 1.35 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : WHR

The strongest argument for WHR centers on Price/Book, P/E Ratio. PEG of 1.04 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : HOFT

The primary concerns for HOFT are Market Cap, Return on Equity, Revenue Growth.

Bear Case : WHR

The primary concerns for WHR are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. Debt-to-equity of 1.88 is elevated, increasing financial risk. Thin 1.1% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

HOFT profiles as a turnaround stock while WHR is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

HOFT carries more volatility with a beta of 1.22 — expect wider price swings.

WHR is growing revenue faster at -9.6% — sustainability is the question.

HOFT generates stronger free cash flow (-3M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

HOFT scores higher overall (53/100 vs 52/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Hooker Furniture Corporation

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · FURNISHINGS, FIXTURES & APPLIANCES · USA

Hooker Furniture Corporation designs, manufactures, imports and markets home, hospitality and contract furniture. The company is headquartered in Martinsville, Virginia.

Visit Website →

Whirlpool Corporation

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · FURNISHINGS, FIXTURES & APPLIANCES · USA

The Whirlpool Corporation is an American multinational manufacturer and marketer of home appliances, headquartered in Benton Charter Township, Michigan, United States.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?