WallStSmart

Gitlab Inc (GTLB)vsPalo Alto Networks Inc (PANW)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Palo Alto Networks Inc generates 936% more annual revenue ($9.89B vs $955.22M). PANW leads profitability with a 13.0% profit margin vs -5.9%. PANW earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 58/100 (C).

GTLB

Hold

35

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 7.3Profit: 2.0Value: 5.0Quality: 4.8
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.77

PANW

Buy

58

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 8.0Profit: 7.0Value: 2.0Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.02
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for GTLB.

PANWSignificantly Overvalued (-81.9%)

Margin of Safety

-81.9%

Fair Value

$84.24

Current Price

$153.22

$68.98 premium

UndervaluedFair: $84.24Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

GTLB1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
23.2%8/10

Revenue surging 23.2% year-over-year

PANW3 strengths · Avg: 9.7/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
60.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 60.5% YoY

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0410/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Market CapQuality
$128.28B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Areas to Watch

GTLB4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-6.3%2/10

ROE of -6.3% — below average capital efficiency

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.772/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

PANW4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Price/BookValuation
11.5x4/10

Trading at 11.5x book value

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
2.962/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
87.3x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : GTLB

The strongest argument for GTLB centers on Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 23.2% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : PANW

The strongest argument for PANW centers on EPS Growth, Debt/Equity, Market Cap. Revenue growth of 14.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : GTLB

The primary concerns for GTLB are EPS Growth, Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : PANW

The primary concerns for PANW are Price/Book, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio. A P/E of 87.3x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

GTLB profiles as a growth stock while PANW is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

PANW carries more volatility with a beta of 0.82 — expect wider price swings.

GTLB is growing revenue faster at 23.2% — sustainability is the question.

PANW generates stronger free cash flow (470M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

PANW scores higher overall (58/100 vs 35/100) and 14.9% revenue growth. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Gitlab Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

GitLab Inc., develops software for the software development life cycle. The company is headquartered in San Francisco, California.

Palo Alto Networks Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

Palo Alto Networks, Inc. provides cybersecurity platform solutions globally. The company is headquartered in Santa Clara, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?