WallStSmart

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc (CRWD)vsGitlab Inc (GTLB)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc generates 379% more annual revenue ($4.81B vs $1.00B). GTLB leads profitability with a -2.5% profit margin vs -3.4%. CRWD earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 40/100 (D).

CRWD

Hold

40

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 9.3Profit: 2.5Value: 3.0Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.00

GTLB

Avoid

33

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 7.3Profit: 2.0Value: 5.0Quality: 5.3
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.03
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

CRWDSignificantly Overvalued (-79.7%)

Margin of Safety

-79.7%

Fair Value

$373.43

Current Price

$671.02

$297.59 premium

UndervaluedFair: $373.43Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for GTLB.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

CRWD4 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
533.0%10/10

Earnings expanding 533.0% YoY

Market CapQuality
$195.73B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Debt/EquityHealth
0.189/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Revenue GrowthGrowth
23.3%8/10

Revenue surging 23.3% year-over-year

GTLB1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
23.1%8/10

Revenue surging 23.1% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

CRWD4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Operating MarginProfitability
1.0%3/10

Operating margin of 1.0%

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
6.452/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Price/BookValuation
38.4x2/10

Trading at 38.4x book value

GTLB4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-5.7%2/10

ROE of -5.7% — below average capital efficiency

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.032/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : CRWD

The strongest argument for CRWD centers on EPS Growth, Market Cap, Debt/Equity. Revenue growth of 23.3% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : GTLB

The strongest argument for GTLB centers on Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 23.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : CRWD

The primary concerns for CRWD are Operating Margin, Piotroski F-Score, PEG Ratio.

Bear Case : GTLB

The primary concerns for GTLB are EPS Growth, Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

CRWD carries more volatility with a beta of 1.06 — expect wider price swings.

CRWD is growing revenue faster at 23.3% — sustainability is the question.

CRWD generates stronger free cash flow (493M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

CRWD scores higher overall (40/100 vs 33/100) and 23.3% revenue growth. Both earn "Hold" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Crowdstrike Holdings Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

CrowdStrike Holdings, Inc. provides cloud solutions for endpoint and cloud workload protection in the United States, Australia, Germany, India, Israel, Romania, and the United Kingdom. The company is headquartered in Sunnyvale, California.

Visit Website →

Gitlab Inc

TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - INFRASTRUCTURE · USA

GitLab Inc., develops software for the software development life cycle. The company is headquartered in San Francisco, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?