Goldman Sachs Group Inc (GS)vsPerella Weinberg Partners (PWP)
GS
Goldman Sachs Group Inc
$925.17
+0.28%
FINANCIAL SERVICES · Cap: $255.00B
PWP
Perella Weinberg Partners
$12.94
+1.33%
FINANCIAL SERVICES · Cap: $1.29B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Goldman Sachs Group Inc generates 10206% more annual revenue ($71.04B vs $689.25M). GS leads profitability with a 31.2% profit margin vs 3.2%. GS trades at a lower P/E of 12.6x. GS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 83/100 (A-).
GS
Exceptional Buy83
out of 100
Grade: A-
PWP
Hold47
out of 100
Grade: D+
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Mega-cap, among the largest globally
Keeps 31 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Strong operational efficiency at 38.2%
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Reasonable price relative to book value
Revenue surging 23.3% year-over-year
Earnings expanding 52.2% YoY
Conservative balance sheet, low leverage
Areas to Watch
Distress zone — elevated risk
Elevated debt levels
0.8% revenue growth
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
3.2% margin — thin
Weak financial health signals
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : GS
The strongest argument for GS centers on Market Cap, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 31.2% and operating margin at 38.2%. Revenue growth of 23.3% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bull Case : PWP
The strongest argument for PWP centers on EPS Growth, Debt/Equity.
Bear Case : GS
The primary concerns for GS are Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity. Debt-to-equity of 6.71 is elevated, increasing financial risk.
Bear Case : PWP
The primary concerns for PWP are Revenue Growth, Market Cap, Profit Margin. A P/E of 51.0x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 3.2% margins leave little buffer for downturns.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
GS profiles as a growth stock while PWP is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.
PWP carries more volatility with a beta of 1.63 — expect wider price swings.
GS is growing revenue faster at 23.3% — sustainability is the question.
GS generates stronger free cash flow (5.6B), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
GS scores higher overall (83/100 vs 47/100), backed by strong 31.2% margins and 23.3% revenue growth. Both earn "Exceptional Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Goldman Sachs Group Inc
FINANCIAL SERVICES · CAPITAL MARKETS · USA
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., is an American multinational investment bank and financial services company headquartered in New York City. It offers services in investment management, securities, asset management, prime brokerage, and securities underwriting. It also provides investment banking to institutional investors.
Perella Weinberg Partners
FINANCIAL SERVICES · CAPITAL MARKETS · USA
Perella Weinberg Partners (PWP) is a distinguished independent advisory and asset management firm, esteemed for its expertise in mergers and acquisitions, restructuring, and capital raising across a wide array of industries. With a strong global footprint and deep-rooted client relationships, PWP delivers tailored financial solutions that enhance client value and navigate complex market landscapes. Its commitment to a client-centric approach and operational excellence not only sets it apart in the financial sector but also underscores its potential as a strategic investment for institutional investors aiming for sustainable growth.
Visit Website →Compare with Other CAPITAL MARKETS Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?