Goldman Sachs Group Inc (GS)vsPerella Weinberg Partners (PWP)
GS
Goldman Sachs Group Inc
$1,038.68
+1.26%
FINANCIAL SERVICES · Cap: $314.06B
PWP
Perella Weinberg Partners
$15.48
-0.26%
FINANCIAL SERVICES · Cap: $1.63B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Goldman Sachs Group Inc generates 8844% more annual revenue ($61.53B vs $687.99M). GS leads profitability with a 29.4% profit margin vs 2.9%. GS trades at a lower P/E of 19.4x. GS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 73/100 (B).
GS
Strong Buy73
out of 100
Grade: B
PWP
Avoid28
out of 100
Grade: F
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Mega-cap, among the largest globally
Strong operational efficiency at 38.6%
Keeps 29 of every $100 in revenue as profit
Reasonable price relative to book value
Earnings expanding 24.2% YoY
Conservative balance sheet, low leverage
Areas to Watch
Expensive relative to growth rate
Negative free cash flow — burning cash
Distress zone — elevated risk
Elevated debt levels
Smaller company, higher risk/reward
2.9% margin — thin
Weak financial health signals
Premium valuation, high expectations priced in
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : GS
The strongest argument for GS centers on Market Cap, Operating Margin, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 29.4% and operating margin at 38.6%. Revenue growth of 14.5% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bull Case : PWP
The strongest argument for PWP centers on Debt/Equity.
Bear Case : GS
The primary concerns for GS are PEG Ratio, Free Cash Flow, Altman Z-Score. Debt-to-equity of 6.10 is elevated, increasing financial risk.
Bear Case : PWP
The primary concerns for PWP are Market Cap, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score. A P/E of 68.6x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 2.9% margins leave little buffer for downturns.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
GS profiles as a mature stock while PWP is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.
PWP carries more volatility with a beta of 1.74 — expect wider price swings.
GS is growing revenue faster at 14.5% — sustainability is the question.
PWP generates stronger free cash flow (-112M), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
GS scores higher overall (73/100 vs 28/100), backed by strong 29.4% margins and 14.5% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Goldman Sachs Group Inc
FINANCIAL SERVICES · CAPITAL MARKETS · USA
The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., is an American multinational investment bank and financial services company headquartered in New York City. It offers services in investment management, securities, asset management, prime brokerage, and securities underwriting. It also provides investment banking to institutional investors.
Perella Weinberg Partners
FINANCIAL SERVICES · CAPITAL MARKETS · USA
Perella Weinberg Partners (PWP) is a distinguished independent advisory and asset management firm, renowned for its expertise in mergers and acquisitions, restructuring, and capital raising across a variety of sectors. Leveraging a comprehensive global network and strong client relationships, PWP delivers tailored financial solutions designed to enhance client value and achieve optimal outcomes. With a commitment to a client-centric approach, the firm stands out as a trustworthy partner in the financial industry, making it an attractive investment prospect for institutional investors keen on engaging with a reputable organization well-positioned for sustained growth in an evolving market landscape.
Visit Website →Compare with Other CAPITAL MARKETS Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?