WallStSmart

Goldman Sachs Group Inc (GS)vsPlutus Financial Group Limited Ordinary Shares (PLUT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Goldman Sachs Group Inc generates 789454% more annual revenue ($67.57B vs $8.56M). GS leads profitability with a 31.0% profit margin vs 0.0%. GS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 81/100 (A-).

GS

Exceptional Buy

81

out of 100

Grade: A-

Growth: 10.0Profit: 8.0Value: 5.7Quality: 3.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 0.14

PLUT

Avoid

18

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.7Profit: 2.5Value: 5.0Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.03

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

GS6 strengths · Avg: 9.7/10
Market CapQuality
$311.24B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Profit MarginProfitability
31.0%10/10

Keeps 31 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Operating MarginProfitability
42.3%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 42.3%

Revenue GrowthGrowth
42.5%10/10

Revenue surging 42.5% year-over-year

EPS GrowthGrowth
92.3%10/10

Earnings expanding 92.3% YoY

P/E RatioValuation
16.8x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

PLUT1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Debt/EquityHealth
0.0110/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Areas to Watch

GS4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.544/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-32.43B2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.142/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Debt/EquityHealth
6.471/10

Elevated debt levels

PLUT4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$45.28M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
0.0%3/10

0.0% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : GS

The strongest argument for GS centers on Market Cap, Profit Margin, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 31.0% and operating margin at 42.3%. Revenue growth of 42.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : PLUT

The strongest argument for PLUT centers on Debt/Equity.

Bear Case : GS

The primary concerns for GS are PEG Ratio, Free Cash Flow, Altman Z-Score. Debt-to-equity of 6.47 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : PLUT

The primary concerns for PLUT are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Profit Margin.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

GS profiles as a growth stock while PLUT is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

GS is growing revenue faster at 42.5% — sustainability is the question.

Monitor CAPITAL MARKETS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

GS scores higher overall (81/100 vs 18/100), backed by strong 31.0% margins and 42.5% revenue growth. Both earn "Exceptional Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Goldman Sachs Group Inc

FINANCIAL SERVICES · CAPITAL MARKETS · USA

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., is an American multinational investment bank and financial services company headquartered in New York City. It offers services in investment management, securities, asset management, prime brokerage, and securities underwriting. It also provides investment banking to institutional investors.

Plutus Financial Group Limited Ordinary Shares

FINANCIAL SERVICES · CAPITAL MARKETS · USA

Plutus Financial Group Limited, provides financial services in Hong Kong. The company is headquartered in Wan Chai, Hong Kong.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?