WallStSmart

Goldman Sachs Group Inc (GS)vsMoelis & Co (MC)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Goldman Sachs Group Inc generates 3816% more annual revenue ($59.40B vs $1.52B). GS leads profitability with a 28.9% profit margin vs 15.4%. GS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.43. GS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 73/100 (B).

GS

Strong Buy

73

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 8.7Profit: 7.5Value: 10.0Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 5/9

MC

Buy

61

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 9.5Value: 7.3Quality: 4.3
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 1.20
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

GSUndervalued (+52.4%)

Margin of Safety

+52.4%

Fair Value

$1768.48

Current Price

$841.84

$926.64 discount

UndervaluedFair: $1768.48Overvalued
MCSignificantly Overvalued (-247.8%)

Margin of Safety

-247.8%

Fair Value

$19.86

Current Price

$55.30

$35.44 premium

UndervaluedFair: $19.86Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

GS6 strengths · Avg: 8.8/10
Market CapQuality
$250.66B10/10

Mega-cap, among the largest globally

Operating MarginProfitability
38.3%10/10

Strong operational efficiency at 38.3%

Profit MarginProfitability
28.9%9/10

Keeps 29 of every $100 in revenue as profit

P/E RatioValuation
16.3x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.4x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Revenue GrowthGrowth
15.2%8/10

15.2% revenue growth

MC2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Return on EquityProfitability
44.8%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 45 in profit

Operating MarginProfitability
26.2%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 26.2%

Areas to Watch

GS1 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
Free Cash FlowQuality
$-16.81B2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

MC3 concerns · Avg: 2.7/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.974/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

EPS GrowthGrowth
-5.5%2/10

Earnings declined 5.5%

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.202/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : GS

The strongest argument for GS centers on Market Cap, Operating Margin, Profit Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 28.9% and operating margin at 38.3%. Revenue growth of 15.2% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : MC

The strongest argument for MC centers on Return on Equity, Operating Margin. Profitability is solid with margins at 15.4% and operating margin at 26.2%. Revenue growth of 11.2% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : GS

The primary concerns for GS are Free Cash Flow.

Bear Case : MC

The primary concerns for MC are PEG Ratio, EPS Growth, Altman Z-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

GS profiles as a growth stock while MC is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

MC carries more volatility with a beta of 1.90 — expect wider price swings.

GS is growing revenue faster at 15.2% — sustainability is the question.

MC generates stronger free cash flow (330M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

GS scores higher overall (73/100 vs 61/100), backed by strong 28.9% margins and 15.2% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Goldman Sachs Group Inc

FINANCIAL SERVICES · CAPITAL MARKETS · USA

The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc., is an American multinational investment bank and financial services company headquartered in New York City. It offers services in investment management, securities, asset management, prime brokerage, and securities underwriting. It also provides investment banking to institutional investors.

Moelis & Co

FINANCIAL SERVICES · CAPITAL MARKETS · USA

Moelis & Company is an investment banking advisory firm in the United States, Europe, and internationally. The company is headquartered in New York, New York.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?