WallStSmart

GoPro Inc (GPRO)vsWearable Devices Ltd. (WLDS)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

GoPro Inc generates 80781% more annual revenue ($568.59M vs $703,000). WLDS leads profitability with a 0.0% profit margin vs -28.5%. GPRO earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 37/100 (F).

GPRO

Hold

37

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 2.0Profit: 2.0Value: 6.0Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: -1.59

WLDS

Avoid

31

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 7.3Profit: 2.5Value: 6.7Quality: 8.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 4.89
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for GPRO.

WLDSUndervalued (+88.6%)

Margin of Safety

+88.6%

Fair Value

$7.91

Current Price

$1.66

$6.25 discount

UndervaluedFair: $7.91Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

GPRO2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Debt/EquityHealth
-2.6310/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

PEG RatioValuation
0.738/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

WLDS4 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Price/BookValuation
0.1x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0110/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.8910/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

Revenue GrowthGrowth
19.0%8/10

19.0% revenue growth

Areas to Watch

GPRO4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$226.94M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-236.1%2/10

ROE of -236.1% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-31.3%2/10

Revenue declined 31.3%

WLDS4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
0.0%4/10

0.0% earnings growth

Market CapQuality
$4.50M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
0.0%3/10

0.0% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : GPRO

The strongest argument for GPRO centers on Debt/Equity, PEG Ratio. PEG of 0.73 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : WLDS

The strongest argument for WLDS centers on Price/Book, Debt/Equity, Altman Z-Score. Revenue growth of 19.0% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : GPRO

The primary concerns for GPRO are Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : WLDS

The primary concerns for WLDS are EPS Growth, Market Cap, Profit Margin.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

GPRO profiles as a turnaround stock while WLDS is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

WLDS carries more volatility with a beta of 2.97 — expect wider price swings.

WLDS is growing revenue faster at 19.0% — sustainability is the question.

WLDS generates stronger free cash flow (-4M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

GPRO scores higher overall (37/100 vs 31/100). WLDS offers better value entry with a 88.6% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

GoPro Inc

TECHNOLOGY · CONSUMER ELECTRONICS · USA

GoPro, Inc. develops and sells mountable and portable cameras, drones, and accessories in the United States and internationally. The company is headquartered in San Mateo, California.

Wearable Devices Ltd.

TECHNOLOGY · CONSUMER ELECTRONICS · USA

Wearable Devices Ltd. is developing a non-invasive neural input interface to control digital devices through subtle finger movements. The company is headquartered in Yokne'am Illit, Israel.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?