WallStSmart

General Mills Inc (GIS)vsPost Holdings Inc (POST)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

General Mills Inc generates 117% more annual revenue ($18.37B vs $8.45B). GIS leads profitability with a 12.0% profit margin vs 4.0%. POST appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.17. POST earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 64/100 (C+).

GIS

Buy

59

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 3.3Profit: 7.0Value: 5.7Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 1.99

POST

Buy

64

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 7.3Profit: 5.5Value: 7.3Quality: 4.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.32
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for GIS.

POSTUndervalued (+26.6%)

Margin of Safety

+26.6%

Fair Value

$151.07

Current Price

$90.43

$60.64 discount

UndervaluedFair: $151.07Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

GIS2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
P/E RatioValuation
8.4x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Return on EquityProfitability
23.7%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 24 in profit

POST3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Price/BookValuation
1.3x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

EPS GrowthGrowth
51.1%10/10

Earnings expanding 51.1% YoY

P/E RatioValuation
15.6x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Areas to Watch

GIS4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
2.2%4/10

2.2% revenue growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.994/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Debt/EquityHealth
1.493/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

POST4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.7%4/10

4.7% revenue growth

Profit MarginProfitability
4.0%3/10

4.0% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.322/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : GIS

The strongest argument for GIS centers on P/E Ratio, Return on Equity.

Bull Case : POST

The strongest argument for POST centers on Price/Book, EPS Growth, P/E Ratio. PEG of 1.17 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : GIS

The primary concerns for GIS are Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity.

Bear Case : POST

The primary concerns for POST are Revenue Growth, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score. Debt-to-equity of 2.39 is elevated, increasing financial risk. Thin 4.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

POST carries more volatility with a beta of 0.33 — expect wider price swings.

POST is growing revenue faster at 4.7% — sustainability is the question.

GIS generates stronger free cash flow (296M), providing more financial flexibility.

Monitor PACKAGED FOODS industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.

Bottom Line

POST scores higher overall (64/100 vs 59/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

General Mills Inc

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · PACKAGED FOODS · USA

General Mills, Inc., is an American multinational manufacturer and marketer of branded consumer foods sold through retail stores. It is headquartered in Golden Valley, Minnesota, a suburb of Minneapolis.

Post Holdings Inc

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · PACKAGED FOODS · USA

Post Holdings, Inc. is a consumer packaged goods holding company in the United States and internationally. The company is headquartered in St. Louis, Missouri.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?