WallStSmart

Geospace Technologies Corporation (GEOS)vsSchlumberger NV (SLB)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Schlumberger NV generates 35524% more annual revenue ($35.94B vs $100.89M). SLB leads profitability with a 9.3% profit margin vs -28.9%. GEOS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.77. SLB earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 48/100 (D+).

GEOS

Hold

47

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.7Profit: 2.0Value: 6.0Quality: 8.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 4.18

SLB

Hold

48

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.0Profit: 6.0Value: 5.3Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 2.13
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for GEOS.

SLBUndervalued (+10.2%)

Margin of Safety

+10.2%

Fair Value

$61.08

Current Price

$58.02

$3.06 discount

UndervaluedFair: $61.08Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

GEOS4 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Price/BookValuation
1.1x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0110/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.1810/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

PEG RatioValuation
0.778/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

SLB1 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Market CapQuality
$83.54B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Areas to Watch

GEOS4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$99.60M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-21.5%2/10

ROE of -21.5% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-30.9%2/10

Earnings declined 30.9%

SLB4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.884/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
2.7%4/10

2.7% revenue growth

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EPS GrowthGrowth
-13.8%2/10

Earnings declined 13.8%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : GEOS

The strongest argument for GEOS centers on Price/Book, Debt/Equity, Altman Z-Score. PEG of 0.77 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : SLB

The strongest argument for SLB centers on Market Cap.

Bear Case : GEOS

The primary concerns for GEOS are Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : SLB

The primary concerns for SLB are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

GEOS profiles as a turnaround stock while SLB is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

SLB carries more volatility with a beta of 0.73 — expect wider price swings.

GEOS is growing revenue faster at 9.5% — sustainability is the question.

SLB generates stronger free cash flow (144M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

SLB scores higher overall (48/100 vs 47/100). Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Geospace Technologies Corporation

ENERGY · OIL & GAS EQUIPMENT & SERVICES · USA

Geospace Technologies Corporation designs and manufactures instruments and equipment used in the oil and gas industry to acquire seismic data for the purpose of locating, characterizing and monitoring hydrocarbon producing reservoirs. The company is headquartered in Houston, Texas.

Schlumberger NV

ENERGY · OIL & GAS EQUIPMENT & SERVICES · USA

Schlumberger Limited is an oilfield services company. Schlumberger has four principal executive offices located in Paris, Houston, London, and The Hague.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?