WallStSmart

Geospace Technologies Corporation (GEOS)vsHalliburton Company (HAL)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Halliburton Company generates 24259% more annual revenue ($22.37B vs $91.85M). HAL leads profitability with a 7.2% profit margin vs -43.1%. HAL appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.77. HAL earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 63/100 (C+).

GEOS

Hold

42

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 3.3Profit: 2.0Value: 6.0Quality: 8.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 4.18

HAL

Buy

63

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 5.5Value: 6.7Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.84
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for GEOS.

HALUndervalued (+1.7%)

Margin of Safety

+1.7%

Fair Value

$37.76

Current Price

$35.84

$1.92 discount

UndervaluedFair: $37.76Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

GEOS4 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Price/BookValuation
0.7x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0110/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.1810/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

PEG RatioValuation
0.778/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

HAL2 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.778/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Price/BookValuation
2.7x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

GEOS4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$67.14M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-21.5%2/10

ROE of -21.5% — below average capital efficiency

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-36.4%2/10

Revenue declined 36.4%

HAL3 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
3.7%4/10

3.7% revenue growth

Profit MarginProfitability
7.2%3/10

7.2% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : GEOS

The strongest argument for GEOS centers on Price/Book, Debt/Equity, Altman Z-Score. PEG of 0.77 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : HAL

The strongest argument for HAL centers on PEG Ratio, Price/Book. PEG of 0.77 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : GEOS

The primary concerns for GEOS are Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : HAL

The primary concerns for HAL are Revenue Growth, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

GEOS profiles as a turnaround stock while HAL is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

HAL carries more volatility with a beta of 0.77 — expect wider price swings.

HAL is growing revenue faster at 3.7% — sustainability is the question.

HAL generates stronger free cash flow (589M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

HAL scores higher overall (63/100 vs 42/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Geospace Technologies Corporation

ENERGY · OIL & GAS EQUIPMENT & SERVICES · USA

Geospace Technologies Corporation designs and manufactures instruments and equipment used in the oil and gas industry to acquire seismic data for the purpose of locating, characterizing and monitoring hydrocarbon producing reservoirs. The company is headquartered in Houston, Texas.

Halliburton Company

ENERGY · OIL & GAS EQUIPMENT & SERVICES · USA

Halliburton Company is an American multinational corporation. One of the world's largest oil field service companies, it has operations in more than 70 countries.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?