WallStSmart

Geospace Technologies Corporation (GEOS)vsHalliburton Company (HAL)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Halliburton Company generates 21875% more annual revenue ($22.17B vs $100.89M). HAL leads profitability with a 7.0% profit margin vs -28.9%. GEOS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.77. HAL earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 60/100 (C+).

GEOS

Hold

47

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 4.7Profit: 2.0Value: 6.0Quality: 8.0
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 4.18

HAL

Buy

60

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 5.5Value: 5.3Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.84
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for GEOS.

HALOvervalued (-5.3%)

Margin of Safety

-5.3%

Fair Value

$37.61

Current Price

$41.23

$3.62 premium

UndervaluedFair: $37.61Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

GEOS4 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Price/BookValuation
1.1x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Debt/EquityHealth
0.0110/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
4.1810/10

Safe zone — low bankruptcy risk

PEG RatioValuation
0.778/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

HAL1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
133.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 133.5% YoY

Areas to Watch

GEOS4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Market CapQuality
$99.60M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-21.5%2/10

ROE of -21.5% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-30.9%2/10

Earnings declined 30.9%

HAL3 concerns · Avg: 2.7/10
Profit MarginProfitability
7.0%3/10

7.0% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-0.3%2/10

Revenue declined 0.3%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : GEOS

The strongest argument for GEOS centers on Price/Book, Debt/Equity, Altman Z-Score. PEG of 0.77 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : HAL

The strongest argument for HAL centers on EPS Growth. PEG of 1.04 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : GEOS

The primary concerns for GEOS are Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity.

Bear Case : HAL

The primary concerns for HAL are Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score, Revenue Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

GEOS profiles as a turnaround stock while HAL is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

HAL carries more volatility with a beta of 0.70 — expect wider price swings.

GEOS is growing revenue faster at 9.5% — sustainability is the question.

HAL generates stronger free cash flow (81M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

HAL scores higher overall (60/100 vs 47/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Geospace Technologies Corporation

ENERGY · OIL & GAS EQUIPMENT & SERVICES · USA

Geospace Technologies Corporation designs and manufactures instruments and equipment used in the oil and gas industry to acquire seismic data for the purpose of locating, characterizing and monitoring hydrocarbon producing reservoirs. The company is headquartered in Houston, Texas.

Halliburton Company

ENERGY · OIL & GAS EQUIPMENT & SERVICES · USA

Halliburton Company is an American multinational corporation. One of the world's largest oil field service companies, it has operations in more than 70 countries.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?