WallStSmart

GEN Restaurant Group, Inc. Class A Common Stock (GENK)vsSea Ltd (SE)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Sea Ltd generates 13115% more annual revenue ($27.72B vs $209.79M). SE leads profitability with a 5.9% profit margin vs -2.1%. SE earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 56/100 (C).

GENK

Avoid

31

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.0Profit: 2.0Value: 6.7Quality: 2.0
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 0.49

SE

Buy

56

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 8.7Profit: 5.5Value: 6.7Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 1.53
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

GENKUndervalued (+59.6%)

Margin of Safety

+59.6%

Fair Value

$4.43

Current Price

$1.75

$2.68 discount

UndervaluedFair: $4.43Overvalued
SEUndervalued (+56.1%)

Margin of Safety

+56.1%

Fair Value

$260.75

Current Price

$106.24

$154.51 discount

UndervaluedFair: $260.75Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

GENK1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.8x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

SE3 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
48.1%10/10

Revenue surging 48.1% year-over-year

Market CapQuality
$65.07B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.15B8/10

Generating 1.1B in free cash flow

Areas to Watch

GENK4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
1.3%4/10

1.3% revenue growth

Market CapQuality
$62.63M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-28.9%2/10

ROE of -28.9% — below average capital efficiency

SE3 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.534/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Profit MarginProfitability
5.9%3/10

5.9% margin — thin

P/E RatioValuation
41.5x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : GENK

The strongest argument for GENK centers on Price/Book.

Bull Case : SE

The strongest argument for SE centers on Revenue Growth, Market Cap, Free Cash Flow. Revenue growth of 48.1% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.04 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : GENK

The primary concerns for GENK are Revenue Growth, Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score. Debt-to-equity of 13.87 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : SE

The primary concerns for SE are Altman Z-Score, Profit Margin, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 41.5x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

GENK profiles as a turnaround stock while SE is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

SE carries more volatility with a beta of 1.52 — expect wider price swings.

SE is growing revenue faster at 48.1% — sustainability is the question.

SE generates stronger free cash flow (1.1B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

SE scores higher overall (56/100 vs 31/100) and 48.1% revenue growth. GENK offers better value entry with a 59.6% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

GEN Restaurant Group, Inc. Class A Common Stock

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RESTAURANTS · USA

GEN Restaurant Group, Inc. operates restaurants in California, Arizona, Hawaii, Nevada, New York, and Texas. The company is headquartered in Cerritos, California.

Sea Ltd

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · INTERNET RETAIL · USA

Sea Limited is engaged in the digital entertainment, e-commerce and digital financial services businesses in Southeast Asia, Latin America, the rest of Asia and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?