WallStSmart

GEN Restaurant Group, Inc. Class A Common Stock (GENK)vsRestaurant Brands International Inc (QSR)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Restaurant Brands International Inc generates 4523% more annual revenue ($9.70B vs $209.79M). QSR leads profitability with a 13.1% profit margin vs -2.1%. QSR earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 68/100 (B-).

GENK

Avoid

31

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.0Profit: 2.0Value: 6.7Quality: 2.0
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 0.49

QSR

Strong Buy

68

out of 100

Grade: B-

Growth: 7.3Profit: 8.0Value: 6.7Quality: 3.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 0.90
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

GENKUndervalued (+59.6%)

Margin of Safety

+59.6%

Fair Value

$4.43

Current Price

$1.75

$2.68 discount

UndervaluedFair: $4.43Overvalued
QSRUndervalued (+25.1%)

Margin of Safety

+25.1%

Fair Value

$94.35

Current Price

$76.96

$17.39 discount

UndervaluedFair: $94.35Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

GENK1 strengths · Avg: 10.0/10
Price/BookValuation
0.8x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

QSR3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
Return on EquityProfitability
33.1%10/10

Every $100 of equity generates 33 in profit

EPS GrowthGrowth
151.2%10/10

Earnings expanding 151.2% YoY

Operating MarginProfitability
27.7%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 27.7%

Areas to Watch

GENK4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
1.3%4/10

1.3% revenue growth

Market CapQuality
$62.63M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-28.9%2/10

ROE of -28.9% — below average capital efficiency

QSR3 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.6%4/10

4.6% revenue growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
0.902/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Debt/EquityHealth
4.071/10

Elevated debt levels

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : GENK

The strongest argument for GENK centers on Price/Book.

Bull Case : QSR

The strongest argument for QSR centers on Return on Equity, EPS Growth, Operating Margin. PEG of 1.24 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : GENK

The primary concerns for GENK are Revenue Growth, Market Cap, Piotroski F-Score. Debt-to-equity of 13.87 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : QSR

The primary concerns for QSR are Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score, Debt/Equity. Debt-to-equity of 4.07 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

GENK profiles as a turnaround stock while QSR is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

GENK carries more volatility with a beta of 0.95 — expect wider price swings.

QSR is growing revenue faster at 4.6% — sustainability is the question.

QSR generates stronger free cash flow (479M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

QSR scores higher overall (68/100 vs 31/100). GENK offers better value entry with a 59.6% margin of safety. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

GEN Restaurant Group, Inc. Class A Common Stock

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RESTAURANTS · USA

GEN Restaurant Group, Inc. operates restaurants in California, Arizona, Hawaii, Nevada, New York, and Texas. The company is headquartered in Cerritos, California.

Restaurant Brands International Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · RESTAURANTS · USA

Restaurant Brands International Inc. owns, operates and franchises quick-service restaurants under the Tim Hortons (TH), Burger King (BK) and Popeyes (PLK) brands. The company is headquartered in Toronto, Canada.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?