WallStSmart

Six Flags Entertainment Corporation (FUN)vsMattel Inc (MAT)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Mattel Inc generates 72% more annual revenue ($5.38B vs $3.12B). MAT leads profitability with a 9.3% profit margin vs -52.8%. MAT appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 1.16. MAT earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 56/100 (C).

FUN

Hold

38

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 5.3Profit: 2.5Value: 6.3Quality: 2.5
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 0.23

MAT

Buy

56

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 2.7Profit: 5.5Value: 8.0Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 3/9Altman Z: 2.56
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FUNUndervalued (+77.7%)

Margin of Safety

+77.7%

Fair Value

$80.85

Current Price

$20.72

$60.13 discount

UndervaluedFair: $80.85Overvalued
MATUndervalued (+21.7%)

Margin of Safety

+21.7%

Fair Value

$20.18

Current Price

$14.08

$6.10 discount

UndervaluedFair: $20.18Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FUN0 strengths · Avg: 0/10

No standout strengths identified

MAT3 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
9.4x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Return on EquityProfitability
23.7%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 24 in profit

Price/BookValuation
1.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

FUN4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
PEG RatioValuation
2.434/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

Return on EquityProfitability
-590.2%2/10

ROE of -590.2% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-73.9%2/10

Earnings declined 73.9%

MAT4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.3%4/10

4.3% revenue growth

Debt/EquityHealth
1.233/10

Elevated debt levels

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
3/93/10

Weak financial health signals

EPS GrowthGrowth
-18.5%2/10

Earnings declined 18.5%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FUN

Revenue growth of 11.7% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : MAT

The strongest argument for MAT centers on P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Price/Book. PEG of 1.16 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : FUN

The primary concerns for FUN are PEG Ratio, Piotroski F-Score, Return on Equity. Debt-to-equity of 19.81 is elevated, increasing financial risk.

Bear Case : MAT

The primary concerns for MAT are Revenue Growth, Debt/Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FUN profiles as a turnaround stock while MAT is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

MAT carries more volatility with a beta of 0.73 — expect wider price swings.

FUN is growing revenue faster at 11.7% — sustainability is the question.

MAT generates stronger free cash flow (-88M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

MAT scores higher overall (56/100 vs 38/100). FUN offers better value entry with a 77.7% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Six Flags Entertainment Corporation

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · LEISURE · USA

Cedar Fair, LP owns and operates amusement and water parks and complementary resort facilities in the United States and Canada. The company is headquartered in Sandusky, Ohio.

Mattel Inc

CONSUMER CYCLICAL · LEISURE · USA

Mattel, Inc., a children's entertainment company, designs and produces toys and consumer products worldwide. The company is headquartered in El Segundo, California.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?