WallStSmart

FitLife Brands, Inc. Common Stock (FTLF)vsHormel Foods Corporation (HRL)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Hormel Foods Corporation generates 13349% more annual revenue ($12.22B vs $90.85M). FTLF leads profitability with a 6.6% profit margin vs 3.8%. FTLF trades at a lower P/E of 16.4x. HRL earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 49/100 (D+).

FTLF

Hold

49

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 7.3Profit: 6.0Value: 6.0Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.78

HRL

Hold

49

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 2.0Profit: 5.0Value: 6.7Quality: 7.0
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.92
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for FTLF.

HRLUndervalued (+48.1%)

Margin of Safety

+48.1%

Fair Value

$46.15

Current Price

$23.62

$22.53 discount

UndervaluedFair: $46.15Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FTLF3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
58.9%10/10

Revenue surging 58.9% year-over-year

P/E RatioValuation
16.4x8/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
2.1x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

HRL1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Price/BookValuation
1.6x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

FTLF4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.784/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Market CapQuality
$92.69M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Profit MarginProfitability
6.6%3/10

6.6% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

HRL4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.854/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

P/E RatioValuation
29.1x4/10

Moderate valuation

Return on EquityProfitability
5.9%3/10

ROE of 5.9% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
3.8%3/10

3.8% margin — thin

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FTLF

The strongest argument for FTLF centers on Revenue Growth, P/E Ratio, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 58.9% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bull Case : HRL

The strongest argument for HRL centers on Price/Book.

Bear Case : FTLF

The primary concerns for FTLF are Altman Z-Score, Market Cap, Profit Margin.

Bear Case : HRL

The primary concerns for HRL are PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio, Return on Equity. Thin 3.8% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FTLF profiles as a hypergrowth stock while HRL is a value play — different risk/reward profiles.

HRL carries more volatility with a beta of 0.34 — expect wider price swings.

FTLF is growing revenue faster at 58.9% — sustainability is the question.

HRL generates stronger free cash flow (97M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

FTLF scores higher overall (49/100 vs 49/100) and 58.9% revenue growth. HRL offers better value entry with a 48.1% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

FitLife Brands, Inc. Common Stock

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · PACKAGED FOODS · USA

FitLife Brands, Inc. provides nutritional supplements for health-conscious consumers in the United States and internationally. The company is headquartered in Omaha, Nebraska.

Visit Website →

Hormel Foods Corporation

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · PACKAGED FOODS · USA

Hormel Foods Corporation is an American company founded in 1891 in Austin, Minnesota, by George A. Hormel as George A. Hormel & Company. Originally focusing on the packaging and selling of ham, Spam, sausage and other pork, chicken, beef and lamb products to consumers; by the 1980s, Hormel began offering a wider range of packaged and refrigerated foods.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?