WallStSmart

Fomento Economico Mexicano (FMX)vsKenon Holdings (KEN)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Fomento Economico Mexicano generates 97720% more annual revenue ($852.92B vs $871.93M). KEN leads profitability with a 7.6% profit margin vs 3.3%. FMX trades at a lower P/E of 26.2x. FMX earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 54/100 (C-).

FMX

Buy

54

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 6.0Profit: 5.5Value: 4.3Quality: 4.3
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.26

KEN

Hold

40

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 6.7Profit: 4.5Value: 3.0Quality: 7.5
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 2.23
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

Intrinsic value data unavailable for FMX.

KENSignificantly Overvalued (-39.5%)

Margin of Safety

-39.5%

Fair Value

$54.68

Current Price

$88.89

$34.21 premium

UndervaluedFair: $54.68Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FMX2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
167.8%10/10

Earnings expanding 167.8% YoY

Price/BookValuation
3.0x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

KEN2 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
43.1%10/10

Revenue surging 43.1% year-over-year

Price/BookValuation
2.9x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Areas to Watch

FMX4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
26.2x4/10

Moderate valuation

Profit MarginProfitability
3.3%3/10

3.3% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
6.942/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

KEN4 concerns · Avg: 2.5/10
Return on EquityProfitability
5.1%3/10

ROE of 5.1% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
7.6%3/10

7.6% margin — thin

P/E RatioValuation
68.0x2/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

EPS GrowthGrowth
-93.7%2/10

Earnings declined 93.7%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FMX

The strongest argument for FMX centers on EPS Growth, Price/Book.

Bull Case : KEN

The strongest argument for KEN centers on Revenue Growth, Price/Book. Revenue growth of 43.1% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : FMX

The primary concerns for FMX are P/E Ratio, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score. Thin 3.3% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : KEN

The primary concerns for KEN are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, P/E Ratio. A P/E of 68.0x leaves little room for execution misses.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FMX profiles as a value stock while KEN is a hypergrowth play — different risk/reward profiles.

KEN carries more volatility with a beta of 0.38 — expect wider price swings.

KEN is growing revenue faster at 43.1% — sustainability is the question.

FMX generates stronger free cash flow (842M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

FMX scores higher overall (54/100 vs 40/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Fomento Economico Mexicano

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · BEVERAGES - BREWERS · USA

Fomento Econmico Mexicano, SAB de CV, is a bottler of Coca-Cola brand beverages. The company is headquartered in Monterrey, Mexico.

Kenon Holdings

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

Kenon Holdings Ltd., is the owner, developer and operator of power generation facilities in Israel and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?