WallStSmart

Anheuser Busch Inbev NV ADR (BUD)vsKenon Holdings (KEN)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Anheuser Busch Inbev NV ADR generates 7561% more annual revenue ($59.32B vs $774.30M). KEN leads profitability with a 63.8% profit margin vs 11.5%. BUD earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 61/100 (C+).

BUD

Buy

61

out of 100

Grade: C+

Growth: 8.0Profit: 6.5Value: 10.0Quality: 5.0

KEN

Hold

44

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 5.3Profit: 6.0Value: 5.0Quality: 9.0
Piotroski: 7/9Altman Z: 2.05
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

BUDUndervalued (+51.3%)

Margin of Safety

+51.3%

Fair Value

$158.65

Current Price

$67.94

$90.71 discount

UndervaluedFair: $158.65Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for KEN.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

BUD5 strengths · Avg: 8.6/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
63.3%10/10

Earnings expanding 63.3% YoY

Market CapQuality
$133.23B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
1.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Operating MarginProfitability
24.9%8/10

Strong operational efficiency at 24.9%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$9.89B8/10

Generating 9.9B in free cash flow

KEN2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Profit MarginProfitability
63.8%10/10

Keeps 64 of every $100 in revenue as profit

Return on EquityProfitability
24.1%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 24 in profit

Areas to Watch

BUD2 concerns · Avg: 4.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
1.604/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.8%4/10

4.8% revenue growth

KEN2 concerns · Avg: 1.5/10
EPS GrowthGrowth
-95.6%2/10

Earnings declined 95.6%

Operating MarginProfitability
-1.0%1/10

Operating margin of -1.0%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : BUD

The strongest argument for BUD centers on EPS Growth, Market Cap, Price/Book.

Bull Case : KEN

The strongest argument for KEN centers on Profit Margin, Return on Equity. Profitability is solid with margins at 63.8% and operating margin at -1.0%.

Bear Case : BUD

The primary concerns for BUD are PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth.

Bear Case : KEN

The primary concerns for KEN are EPS Growth, Operating Margin.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

BUD profiles as a value stock while KEN is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.

BUD carries more volatility with a beta of 0.73 — expect wider price swings.

KEN is growing revenue faster at 8.3% — sustainability is the question.

BUD generates stronger free cash flow (9.9B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

BUD scores higher overall (61/100 vs 44/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Anheuser Busch Inbev NV ADR

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · BEVERAGES - BREWERS · USA

Anheuser-Busch InBev SA / NV is engaged in the production, distribution and sale of beer, alcoholic beverages and soft drinks worldwide.

Kenon Holdings

UTILITIES · UTILITIES - INDEPENDENT POWER PRODUCERS · USA

Kenon Holdings Ltd., is the owner, developer and operator of power generation facilities in Israel and internationally. The company is headquartered in Singapore.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?