Fresenius Medical Care Corporation (FMS)vsUber Technologies Inc (UBER)
FMS
Fresenius Medical Care Corporation
$22.03
+1.76%
HEALTHCARE · Cap: $11.83B
UBER
Uber Technologies Inc
$75.45
-1.67%
TECHNOLOGY · Cap: $156.19B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Uber Technologies Inc generates 177% more annual revenue ($53.69B vs $19.36B). UBER leads profitability with a 15.9% profit margin vs 4.9%. FMS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.70. UBER earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 54/100 (C-).
FMS
Buy50
out of 100
Grade: C-
UBER
Buy54
out of 100
Grade: C-
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+76.3%
Fair Value
$101.47
Current Price
$22.03
$79.44 discount
Margin of Safety
+34.2%
Fair Value
$108.42
Current Price
$75.45
$32.97 discount
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Reasonable price relative to book value
Growing faster than its price suggests
Every $100 of equity generates 35 in profit
Large-cap with strong market position
Generating 2.3B in free cash flow
Areas to Watch
Grey zone — moderate risk
ROE of 7.8% — below average capital efficiency
4.9% margin — thin
Revenue declined 5.5%
Expensive relative to growth rate
Earnings declined 84.6%
Distress zone — elevated risk
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : FMS
The strongest argument for FMS centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, PEG Ratio. PEG of 0.70 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bull Case : UBER
The strongest argument for UBER centers on Return on Equity, Market Cap, Free Cash Flow. Profitability is solid with margins at 15.9% and operating margin at 14.6%. Revenue growth of 14.5% demonstrates continued momentum.
Bear Case : FMS
The primary concerns for FMS are Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. Thin 4.9% margins leave little buffer for downturns.
Bear Case : UBER
The primary concerns for UBER are PEG Ratio, EPS Growth, Altman Z-Score.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
FMS profiles as a value stock while UBER is a mature play — different risk/reward profiles.
UBER carries more volatility with a beta of 1.16 — expect wider price swings.
UBER is growing revenue faster at 14.5% — sustainability is the question.
UBER generates stronger free cash flow (2.3B), providing more financial flexibility.
Bottom Line
UBER scores higher overall (54/100 vs 50/100), backed by strong 15.9% margins and 14.5% revenue growth. FMS offers better value entry with a 76.3% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Fresenius Medical Care Corporation
HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL CARE FACILITIES · USA
Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA provides dialysis care and related dialysis care services in Germany, North America and internationally. The company is headquartered in Bad Homburg, Germany.
Visit Website →Uber Technologies Inc
TECHNOLOGY · SOFTWARE - APPLICATION · USA
Uber Technologies, Inc., commonly known as Uber, is an American technology company. Its services include ride-hailing, food delivery (Uber Eats), package delivery, couriers, freight transportation, and, through a partnership with Lime, electric bicycle and motorized scooter rental. The company is based in San Francisco, California.
Visit Website →Compare with Other MEDICAL CARE FACILITIES Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?