DaVita HealthCare Partners Inc (DVA)vsFresenius Medical Care Corporation (FMS)
DVA
DaVita HealthCare Partners Inc
$149.31
-0.30%
HEALTHCARE · Cap: $9.98B
FMS
Fresenius Medical Care Corporation
$21.64
-2.13%
HEALTHCARE · Cap: $12.92B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Fresenius Medical Care Corporation generates 44% more annual revenue ($19.63B vs $13.64B). DVA leads profitability with a 5.5% profit margin vs 5.0%. DVA appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.56. DVA earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 64/100 (C+).
DVA
Buy64
out of 100
Grade: C+
FMS
Buy62
out of 100
Grade: C+
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+11.8%
Fair Value
$163.57
Current Price
$149.31
$14.26 discount
Margin of Safety
+73.4%
Fair Value
$90.32
Current Price
$21.64
$68.68 discount
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Every $100 of equity generates 65 in profit
Growing faster than its price suggests
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Reasonable price relative to book value
Earnings expanding 420.0% YoY
Growing faster than its price suggests
Areas to Watch
5.5% margin — thin
Weak financial health signals
Distress zone — elevated risk
Grey zone — moderate risk
ROE of 7.9% — below average capital efficiency
5.0% margin — thin
Revenue declined 30.0%
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : DVA
The strongest argument for DVA centers on Return on Equity, PEG Ratio, P/E Ratio. PEG of 0.56 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bull Case : FMS
The strongest argument for FMS centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, EPS Growth. PEG of 0.77 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bear Case : DVA
The primary concerns for DVA are Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score, Altman Z-Score.
Bear Case : FMS
The primary concerns for FMS are Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. Thin 5.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
FMS carries more volatility with a beta of 0.94 — expect wider price swings.
DVA is growing revenue faster at 9.9% — sustainability is the question.
FMS generates stronger free cash flow (564M), providing more financial flexibility.
Monitor MEDICAL CARE FACILITIES industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.
Bottom Line
DVA scores higher overall (64/100 vs 62/100). FMS offers better value entry with a 73.4% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
DaVita HealthCare Partners Inc
HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL CARE FACILITIES · USA
DaVita Inc. provides kidney dialysis services through a network of outpatient dialysis centers in the United States.
Fresenius Medical Care Corporation
HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL CARE FACILITIES · USA
Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA provides dialysis care and related dialysis care services in Germany, North America and internationally. The company is headquartered in Bad Homburg, Germany.
Visit Website →Compare with Other MEDICAL CARE FACILITIES Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?