Fresenius Medical Care Corporation (FMS)vsPACS Group, Inc. (PACS)
FMS
Fresenius Medical Care Corporation
$22.26
+1.04%
HEALTHCARE · Cap: $12.47B
PACS
PACS Group, Inc.
$32.61
-3.26%
HEALTHCARE · Cap: $5.30B
Smart Verdict
WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison
Fresenius Medical Care Corporation generates 271% more annual revenue ($19.63B vs $5.29B). FMS leads profitability with a 5.0% profit margin vs 3.6%. FMS appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.73. FMS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 62/100 (C+).
FMS
Buy62
out of 100
Grade: C+
PACS
Buy58
out of 100
Grade: C
Intrinsic Value Comparison
Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula
Margin of Safety
+73.4%
Fair Value
$90.32
Current Price
$22.26
$68.06 discount
Margin of Safety
+31.4%
Fair Value
$57.10
Current Price
$32.61
$24.49 discount
Key Strengths & Concerns
Side-by-side fundamental analysis
Key Strengths
Attractively priced relative to earnings
Reasonable price relative to book value
Growing faster than its price suggests
Earnings expanding 57.2% YoY
Every $100 of equity generates 23 in profit
Areas to Watch
4.2% earnings growth
Grey zone — moderate risk
ROE of 7.9% — below average capital efficiency
5.0% margin — thin
Moderate valuation
3.6% margin — thin
Negative free cash flow — burning cash
Distress zone — elevated risk
Comparative Analysis Report
WallStSmart ResearchBull Case : FMS
The strongest argument for FMS centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, PEG Ratio. PEG of 0.73 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bull Case : PACS
The strongest argument for PACS centers on EPS Growth, Return on Equity. Revenue growth of 12.4% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 1.03 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.
Bear Case : FMS
The primary concerns for FMS are EPS Growth, Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity. Thin 5.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.
Bear Case : PACS
The primary concerns for PACS are P/E Ratio, Profit Margin, Free Cash Flow. Debt-to-equity of 4.93 is elevated, increasing financial risk. Thin 3.6% margins leave little buffer for downturns.
Key Dynamics to Monitor
PACS is growing revenue faster at 12.4% — sustainability is the question.
FMS generates stronger free cash flow (564M), providing more financial flexibility.
Monitor MEDICAL CARE FACILITIES industry trends, competitive dynamics, and regulatory changes.
Bottom Line
FMS scores higher overall (62/100 vs 58/100). PACS offers better value entry with a 31.4% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Buy" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.
This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.
Fresenius Medical Care Corporation
HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL CARE FACILITIES · USA
Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA provides dialysis care and related dialysis care services in Germany, North America and internationally. The company is headquartered in Bad Homburg, Germany.
Visit Website →PACS Group, Inc.
HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL CARE FACILITIES · USA
PACS Group, Inc. is a leading technology solutions provider focused on enhancing operational efficiency and productivity across a wide array of industries. The company excels in developing innovative software and hardware systems that optimize workflows and enhance data management capabilities. With a strong commitment to research and development, PACS Group is well-positioned to capitalize on emerging technological trends, reinforcing its status as a key player in the digital transformation landscape. Its strategic partnerships and extensive market presence further strengthen its competitive advantage, presenting a compelling investment opportunity for institutional investors seeking growth in the evolving technology sector.
Visit Website →Compare with Other MEDICAL CARE FACILITIES Stocks
Want to dig deeper into these stocks?