WallStSmart

Fresenius Medical Care Corporation (FMS)vsInnovAge Holding Corp (INNV)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Fresenius Medical Care Corporation generates 1863% more annual revenue ($19.43B vs $989.71M). FMS leads profitability with a 4.8% profit margin vs -0.3%. FMS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 58/100 (C).

FMS

Buy

58

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 4.7Profit: 5.0Value: 9.3Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 1.96

INNV

Avoid

26

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 6.0Profit: 3.5Value: 4.0Quality: 6.5
Piotroski: 4/9Altman Z: 2.48
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FMSUndervalued (+68.5%)

Margin of Safety

+68.5%

Fair Value

$76.29

Current Price

$22.20

$54.09 discount

UndervaluedFair: $76.29Overvalued
INNVSignificantly Overvalued (-19.4%)

Margin of Safety

-19.4%

Fair Value

$6.85

Current Price

$10.92

$4.07 premium

UndervaluedFair: $6.85Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FMS3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
12.0x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
0.8x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

PEG RatioValuation
0.748/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

INNV1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
18.3%8/10

18.3% revenue growth

Areas to Watch

FMS4 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
1.4%4/10

1.4% revenue growth

Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.964/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Return on EquityProfitability
7.5%3/10

ROE of 7.5% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
4.8%3/10

4.8% margin — thin

INNV4 concerns · Avg: 2.0/10
Market CapQuality
$1.49B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
-9.7%2/10

ROE of -9.7% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-87.8%2/10

Earnings declined 87.8%

Profit MarginProfitability
-0.3%1/10

Currently unprofitable

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FMS

The strongest argument for FMS centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, PEG Ratio. PEG of 0.74 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : INNV

The strongest argument for INNV centers on Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 18.3% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : FMS

The primary concerns for FMS are Revenue Growth, Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity. Thin 4.8% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : INNV

The primary concerns for INNV are Market Cap, Return on Equity, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FMS profiles as a value stock while INNV is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

FMS carries more volatility with a beta of 0.83 — expect wider price swings.

INNV is growing revenue faster at 18.3% — sustainability is the question.

FMS generates stronger free cash flow (620M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

FMS scores higher overall (58/100 vs 26/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Fresenius Medical Care Corporation

HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL CARE FACILITIES · USA

Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA provides dialysis care and related dialysis care services in Germany, North America and internationally. The company is headquartered in Bad Homburg, Germany.

Visit Website →

InnovAge Holding Corp

HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL CARE FACILITIES · USA

InnovAge Holding Corp. The company is headquartered in Denver, Colorado.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?