WallStSmart

Fresenius Medical Care Corporation (FMS)vsInnovAge Holding Corp (INNV)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Fresenius Medical Care Corporation generates 1939% more annual revenue ($19.36B vs $949.17M). FMS leads profitability with a 4.9% profit margin vs -1.2%. FMS earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 50/100 (C-).

FMS

Buy

50

out of 100

Grade: C-

Growth: 2.7Profit: 5.0Value: 9.3Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 6/9Altman Z: 1.96

INNV

Avoid

24

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 5.3Profit: 2.5Value: 4.0Quality: 6.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: 1.74
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FMSUndervalued (+68.9%)

Margin of Safety

+68.9%

Fair Value

$77.34

Current Price

$22.03

$55.31 discount

UndervaluedFair: $77.34Overvalued
INNVSignificantly Overvalued (-25.5%)

Margin of Safety

-25.5%

Fair Value

$6.52

Current Price

$7.08

$0.56 premium

UndervaluedFair: $6.52Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FMS3 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
P/E RatioValuation
11.9x10/10

Attractively priced relative to earnings

Price/BookValuation
0.8x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

PEG RatioValuation
0.798/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

INNV1 strengths · Avg: 8.0/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
15.5%8/10

15.5% revenue growth

Areas to Watch

FMS4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.964/10

Grey zone — moderate risk

Return on EquityProfitability
7.1%3/10

ROE of 7.1% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
4.9%3/10

4.9% margin — thin

Revenue GrowthGrowth
-5.5%2/10

Revenue declined 5.5%

INNV4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Altman Z-ScoreHealth
1.744/10

Distress zone — elevated risk

Market CapQuality
$1.22B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
-9.7%2/10

ROE of -9.7% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-87.8%2/10

Earnings declined 87.8%

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FMS

The strongest argument for FMS centers on P/E Ratio, Price/Book, PEG Ratio. PEG of 0.79 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bull Case : INNV

The strongest argument for INNV centers on Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 15.5% demonstrates continued momentum.

Bear Case : FMS

The primary concerns for FMS are Altman Z-Score, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. Thin 4.9% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : INNV

The primary concerns for INNV are Altman Z-Score, Market Cap, Return on Equity.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FMS profiles as a value stock while INNV is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

FMS carries more volatility with a beta of 0.81 — expect wider price swings.

INNV is growing revenue faster at 15.5% — sustainability is the question.

FMS generates stronger free cash flow (37M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

FMS scores higher overall (50/100 vs 24/100). Both earn "Buy" and "Avoid" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Fresenius Medical Care Corporation

HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL CARE FACILITIES · USA

Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA provides dialysis care and related dialysis care services in Germany, North America and internationally. The company is headquartered in Bad Homburg, Germany.

Visit Website →

InnovAge Holding Corp

HEALTHCARE · MEDICAL CARE FACILITIES · USA

InnovAge Holding Corp. The company is headquartered in Denver, Colorado.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?