WallStSmart

Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG)vsW&T Offshore Inc (WTI)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Diamondback Energy Inc generates 2672% more annual revenue ($14.46B vs $521.61M). FANG leads profitability with a 2.0% profit margin vs -27.2%. WTI appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.73. FANG earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 41/100 (D).

FANG

Hold

41

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 4.7Profit: 4.0Value: 4.7Quality: 4.5
Piotroski: 2/9Altman Z: 1.28

WTI

Hold

39

out of 100

Grade: F

Growth: 4.0Profit: 3.0Value: 7.7Quality: 5.0
Piotroski: 5/9Altman Z: -0.83
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FANGUndervalued (+41.1%)

Margin of Safety

+41.1%

Fair Value

$286.80

Current Price

$192.62

$94.18 discount

UndervaluedFair: $286.80Overvalued
WTIUndervalued (+60.8%)

Margin of Safety

+60.8%

Fair Value

$6.68

Current Price

$3.69

$2.98 discount

UndervaluedFair: $6.68Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FANG2 strengths · Avg: 9.5/10
Price/BookValuation
1.5x10/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Market CapQuality
$56.94B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

WTI3 strengths · Avg: 8.7/10
Debt/EquityHealth
-1.5910/10

Conservative balance sheet, low leverage

PEG RatioValuation
0.738/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Revenue GrowthGrowth
15.5%8/10

15.5% revenue growth

Areas to Watch

FANG4 concerns · Avg: 3.3/10
Revenue GrowthGrowth
4.2%4/10

4.2% revenue growth

Return on EquityProfitability
1.1%3/10

ROE of 1.1% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
2.0%3/10

2.0% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
2/93/10

Weak financial health signals

WTI4 concerns · Avg: 2.3/10
Market CapQuality
$604.04M3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Return on EquityProfitability
-168.9%2/10

ROE of -168.9% — below average capital efficiency

EPS GrowthGrowth
-97.8%2/10

Earnings declined 97.8%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-7.94M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FANG

The strongest argument for FANG centers on Price/Book, Market Cap.

Bull Case : WTI

The strongest argument for WTI centers on Debt/Equity, PEG Ratio, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 15.5% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.73 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : FANG

The primary concerns for FANG are Revenue Growth, Return on Equity, Profit Margin. A P/E of 208.7x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 2.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : WTI

The primary concerns for WTI are Market Cap, Return on Equity, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FANG profiles as a value stock while WTI is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

FANG carries more volatility with a beta of 0.44 — expect wider price swings.

WTI is growing revenue faster at 15.5% — sustainability is the question.

FANG generates stronger free cash flow (895M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

FANG scores higher overall (41/100 vs 39/100). WTI offers better value entry with a 60.8% margin of safety. Both earn "Hold" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Diamondback Energy Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.

W&T Offshore Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

W&T Offshore, Inc., an independent oil and natural gas producer, is engaged in the acquisition, exploration and development of oil and natural gas properties in the Gulf of Mexico. The company is headquartered in Houston, Texas.

Visit Website →

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?