WallStSmart

Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG)vsTurning Point Brands Inc (TPB)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Diamondback Energy Inc generates 2910% more annual revenue ($14.47B vs $480.90M). TPB leads profitability with a 11.5% profit margin vs 2.0%. TPB appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.05. TPB earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 59/100 (C).

FANG

Hold

41

out of 100

Grade: D

Growth: 5.3Profit: 4.0Value: 4.7Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.24

TPB

Buy

59

out of 100

Grade: C

Growth: 6.0Profit: 7.0Value: 6.3Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FANGUndervalued (+44.6%)

Margin of Safety

+44.6%

Fair Value

$305.11

Current Price

$196.15

$108.96 discount

UndervaluedFair: $305.11Overvalued

Intrinsic value data unavailable for TPB.

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FANG2 strengths · Avg: 8.5/10
Market CapQuality
$53.58B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
1.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

TPB3 strengths · Avg: 9.0/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.0510/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

Return on EquityProfitability
22.5%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 23 in profit

Revenue GrowthGrowth
16.8%8/10

16.8% revenue growth

Areas to Watch

FANG4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
Return on EquityProfitability
0.5%3/10

ROE of 0.5% — below average capital efficiency

Profit MarginProfitability
2.0%3/10

2.0% margin — thin

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
57.132/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

TPB4 concerns · Avg: 2.8/10
P/E RatioValuation
31.8x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Market CapQuality
$1.80B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

EPS GrowthGrowth
-24.1%2/10

Earnings declined 24.1%

Free Cash FlowQuality
$-27.40M2/10

Negative free cash flow — burning cash

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FANG

The strongest argument for FANG centers on Market Cap, Price/Book.

Bull Case : TPB

The strongest argument for TPB centers on PEG Ratio, Return on Equity, Revenue Growth. Revenue growth of 16.8% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.05 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : FANG

The primary concerns for FANG are Return on Equity, Profit Margin, Piotroski F-Score. A P/E of 196.3x leaves little room for execution misses. Thin 2.0% margins leave little buffer for downturns.

Bear Case : TPB

The primary concerns for TPB are P/E Ratio, Market Cap, EPS Growth.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FANG profiles as a value stock while TPB is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

TPB carries more volatility with a beta of 0.93 — expect wider price swings.

TPB is growing revenue faster at 16.8% — sustainability is the question.

FANG generates stronger free cash flow (895M), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

TPB scores higher overall (59/100 vs 41/100) and 16.8% revenue growth. FANG offers better value entry with a 44.6% margin of safety. Both earn "Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Diamondback Energy Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.

Turning Point Brands Inc

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · TOBACCO · USA

Turning Point Brands, Inc. manufactures, markets and distributes branded consumer products. The company is headquartered in Louisville, Kentucky.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?