WallStSmart

Diamondback Energy Inc (FANG)vsTurning Point Brands Inc (TPB)

VS

Smart Verdict

WallStSmart Research — data-driven comparison

Diamondback Energy Inc generates 2987% more annual revenue ($14.29B vs $463.06M). TPB leads profitability with a 12.6% profit margin vs 11.6%. TPB appears more attractively valued with a PEG of 0.05. TPB earns a higher WallStSmart Score of 73/100 (B).

FANG

Hold

45

out of 100

Grade: D+

Growth: 5.3Profit: 4.0Value: 4.7Quality: 3.3
Piotroski: 1/9Altman Z: 1.24

TPB

Strong Buy

73

out of 100

Grade: B

Growth: 8.7Profit: 7.5Value: 8.7Quality: 5.0
IV

Intrinsic Value Comparison

Multi-model valuation · Graham Formula

FANGSignificantly Overvalued (-29.4%)

Margin of Safety

-29.4%

Fair Value

$130.64

Current Price

$196.02

$65.38 premium

UndervaluedFair: $130.64Overvalued
TPBUndervalued (+12.1%)

Margin of Safety

+12.1%

Fair Value

$145.55

Current Price

$88.39

$57.16 discount

UndervaluedFair: $145.55Overvalued

Key Strengths & Concerns

Side-by-side fundamental analysis

Key Strengths

FANG3 strengths · Avg: 8.3/10
Market CapQuality
$55.59B9/10

Large-cap with strong market position

Price/BookValuation
1.5x8/10

Reasonable price relative to book value

Free Cash FlowQuality
$1.40B8/10

Generating 1.4B in free cash flow

TPB4 strengths · Avg: 9.3/10
PEG RatioValuation
0.0510/10

Growing faster than its price suggests

EPS GrowthGrowth
194.5%10/10

Earnings expanding 194.5% YoY

Return on EquityProfitability
24.2%9/10

Every $100 of equity generates 24 in profit

Revenue GrowthGrowth
29.2%8/10

Revenue surging 29.2% year-over-year

Areas to Watch

FANG4 concerns · Avg: 3.0/10
P/E RatioValuation
34.4x4/10

Premium valuation, high expectations priced in

Return on EquityProfitability
3.7%3/10

ROE of 3.7% — below average capital efficiency

Piotroski F-ScoreQuality
1/93/10

Weak financial health signals

PEG RatioValuation
103.602/10

Expensive relative to growth rate

TPB2 concerns · Avg: 3.5/10
P/E RatioValuation
28.4x4/10

Moderate valuation

Market CapQuality
$1.69B3/10

Smaller company, higher risk/reward

Comparative Analysis Report

WallStSmart Research

Bull Case : FANG

The strongest argument for FANG centers on Market Cap, Price/Book, Free Cash Flow.

Bull Case : TPB

The strongest argument for TPB centers on PEG Ratio, EPS Growth, Return on Equity. Revenue growth of 29.2% demonstrates continued momentum. PEG of 0.05 suggests the stock is reasonably priced for its growth.

Bear Case : FANG

The primary concerns for FANG are P/E Ratio, Return on Equity, Piotroski F-Score.

Bear Case : TPB

The primary concerns for TPB are P/E Ratio, Market Cap.

Key Dynamics to Monitor

FANG profiles as a declining stock while TPB is a growth play — different risk/reward profiles.

TPB carries more volatility with a beta of 0.85 — expect wider price swings.

TPB is growing revenue faster at 29.2% — sustainability is the question.

FANG generates stronger free cash flow (1.4B), providing more financial flexibility.

Bottom Line

TPB scores higher overall (73/100 vs 45/100) and 29.2% revenue growth. Both earn "Strong Buy" and "Hold" ratings respectively — the choice depends on your investment horizon and risk tolerance.

This analysis is generated from publicly available financial data. Not financial advice.

Diamondback Energy Inc

ENERGY · OIL & GAS E&P · USA

Diamondback Energy is a company engaged in hydrocarbon exploration and headquartered in Midland, Texas.

Turning Point Brands Inc

CONSUMER DEFENSIVE · TOBACCO · USA

Turning Point Brands, Inc. manufactures, markets and distributes branded consumer products. The company is headquartered in Louisville, Kentucky.

Want to dig deeper into these stocks?